Hey Dan, I like the change of pace overall with this image. I also like the side cut of the stone with the resulting exposure.
The only thing I would offer up for ideas would be to tone it down on the highlight just a small amount maybe, it could just be my monitor, but it seems just a bit bright.
With that said, it could also help bring out even more detail in the stone texture & granules.
This is nice, Dan. It's very subtle in its coloration, which I like. You might consider burning down the two light-toned spots in the orange area; my eye is really drawn to them. The level of detail is quite nice.
-P
Posted by Lon Overacker on November 11, 2009 at 1:51 PM
Dan,
Not doing a whole lot for me Dan. I like the soft color combo of the orange and blues and the texture is nice. What's missing for me is the depth and dimensions. I can see from the lines, change in surface and the "peak" in the UR, but dimensionally it is quite flat - if that makes any sense, and I think in reality the angles of the surface change quite a bit - but I could be wrong about that.
Dan, I usually like abstracts, but I'm on the fence on this image. I like the textures and subtle color, but its not on the same level as your typical images. Best Regards.
Posted by Eric Good on November 13, 2009 at 7:05 PM
The general composition, colors and shapes are all quite nice and I can see why this caught your eye. Not sure what more you could do without making an image very different from the scene. It's simple but it works for me.
Discussion
5 repliesWhat do you think?
Nikon D300
24-85 Nikkor
- Dan
The only thing I would offer up for ideas would be to tone it down on the highlight just a small amount maybe, it could just be my monitor, but it seems just a bit bright.
With that said, it could also help bring out even more detail in the stone texture & granules.
-P
Not doing a whole lot for me Dan. I like the soft color combo of the orange and blues and the texture is nice. What's missing for me is the depth and dimensions. I can see from the lines, change in surface and the "peak" in the UR, but dimensionally it is quite flat - if that makes any sense, and I think in reality the angles of the surface change quite a bit - but I could be wrong about that.
Lon