Posted by Grant Collier on November 19, 2009 at 8:45 PM
I'm curious as to which of these two Kilauea lava flow pictures people prefer. #1 (this one) or #2 (below)
Thanks!
Posted by Grant Collier on November 19, 2009 at 8:47 PM
#2
Posted by Paul Wegemann on November 19, 2009 at 9:01 PM
Grant, for me, #1 has a bit more initial impact, but these are both wild and wonderful. Why do we have to choose? I choose both.
Posted by Art Escobado on November 19, 2009 at 9:11 PM
#1
Posted by Momo Vuyisich on November 19, 2009 at 9:27 PM
#1.
Posted by Phillip Noll on November 19, 2009 at 9:51 PM
I guess it would depend on what the end use of the image will be. If you are looking for something that shows a classic view of a basaltic lava flow/eruption then #1 would be the pick. However, if you are looking for a more surreal depiction of the creation of new land, then I would pick #2. Both are awesome shots!
Posted by Larry Daniel on November 19, 2009 at 10:07 PM
#1
Posted by Jeff Beard on November 19, 2009 at 10:11 PM
#1 describes the context more precisely but #2 had a far more visceral impac. Great shots and I agree...dont't make me choose!
Posted by Joshua Hardin on November 19, 2009 at 10:15 PM
Another vote for #1.
Posted by John Mumaw on November 19, 2009 at 10:54 PM
Yet another vote for #1, just for the immediate impact.
Posted by Jeff Sirota on November 19, 2009 at 10:57 PM
I'm going to go with #2. They're both great, but I really like the rock outlines on the right side of #2.
Posted by Todd Caudle on November 19, 2009 at 11:02 PM
Definitely #1.
Posted by Scott Fricke on November 19, 2009 at 11:04 PM
I like #1 slightly better, the detail and patterns in the smoke add a little more interest to me.
Posted by Doug Andrews on November 19, 2009 at 11:27 PM
I like #2 more.
Posted by Laurie Wendt on November 19, 2009 at 11:58 PM
I like #1 better. The rising smoke is more defined in it.
Posted by Dean Sauskojus on November 20, 2009 at 12:07 AM
#2. I favor the surreal. Has a nice flow to the top and makes you wonder, What is that?
Posted by D J Kuklinski on November 20, 2009 at 12:35 AM
Numero uno.
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on November 20, 2009 at 1:31 AM
Posted by Morris McClung on November 20, 2009 at 12:10 PM
Another minority vote for #2. I like the movement of the smoke. Both are excellent!
Posted by Grant Collier on November 20, 2009 at 12:52 PM
Thanks! #1 it is...I was leaning in that direction at first...
Posted by Stan Rose on November 20, 2009 at 1:12 PM
Uno!!
Posted by Bryan Maltais on November 20, 2009 at 4:10 PM
1!
Posted by Jack Brauer on November 20, 2009 at 8:08 PM
I'd say #2, if you could pull back on the exposure just a little bit. I like #2 because you can see the ocean, thus there's more of a clue as to what we're looking at. The first one could be mistaken for a forest fire. Regardless, they're both awesome!
Discussion
33 repliesThanks!
Pat Buys
I prefer #2...I like the motion of the smoke/fog/clouds. There also seem to be more interesting elements working for it. Cool subject!
#1 describes the situation a bit more obviously for me. The rock is nicely lit and the plume of smoke/steam/lava at the center is very cool.
#2 is a bit more abstract (especially taken out of context of comparison). More Northernlightish, abstract what-the-heck feeling.
Both are very nice. I guess it depends on use