Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Epson R2400 Printer Question

Discussion

6 replies
Posted by Preston Birdwell on November 29, 2009 at 11:59 AM
Hi All,

When I open the Epson printer driver and select my paper type (usually Epson Premium Luster), I can then choose between "Photo", "Best Photo", and "Photo RPM".

I normally use "Best Photo", but my question is: What does "Photo RPM" mean? I can't find an explanation for this setting in the documentation or at the Epson site.

Does this setting give a print of higher quality? How much better is the quality as opposed to "Best Photo", and what are the downsides, if any?

Thanks, as always,

-P
Posted by Frank Winters on November 29, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Hi Preston,

It might mean Remote Print Manager -- a way to print remotely. Try googling that...

~Frank

Posted by James Hersey on November 29, 2009 at 3:10 PM
For Epson in means the highest setting 5760x1440

http://files.support.epson.com/pdf/r2400_/r2400_ug.pdf

see page 31
Posted by Aaron Ellingsen on November 29, 2009 at 3:24 PM
James is correct, I believe.

I regularly use a r2400 at home, and have tested all of the settings. The "photo RPM" setting is claimed to be the highest quality; but as far as i can tell, it just takes longer and uses more ink than the "best photo" setting. The end results are not drastically better, nor worth the extra cost in ink, IMO. I primarily use epson premium luster paper FWIW. I suppose it is possible that the RPM setting would have worthwhile results on different papers though.
Posted by Preston Birdwell on December 1, 2009 at 2:21 PM
Thanks, guys.

Aaron, when you print using the RPM setting, what dpi are you using? I normally print at 360 dpi. Would a higher dpi, say 720 or 1440, along with RPM make a difference?

The results I obtain with my current settings are very nice, so I'll retain them. I may run a test print using RPM just to see for myself, once I hear back from you.

Thanks again,

-P
Posted by Aaron Ellingsen on December 2, 2009 at 3:54 PM
Hi Preston,

I don't recall exactly what I tried when I was in my testing phase, since its been a few years, but I am pretty sure that I cranked the dpi up quite a ways just to see how good the prints could get. To my eye there wasn't much difference between anything I tried above the "best photo" setting and 360 dpi. I just kept the settings there, and haven't looked back since.

Try it out for yourself though. I like to believe that I have a pretty critical eye towards my printing (and photography in general), but you never know; what looks good to me might look like "used oats" to you. :smile:
Posted by Preston Birdwell on December 3, 2009 at 11:50 AM
Aaron,

You liked the quote in my sig did you? :smile:

I'll run a test print or two and see whaz up. Thanks again for your opinion on this.

-P