I'd be interested to know what you think of HDR vs normal vs B&W, etc. I had a great time post-processing
Linnet
Posted by Todd Caudle on February 2, 2010 at 10:31 AM
Kudos on that first hdr, it looks great. The b&w and second hdr don't do it for me.
Posted by Brian Jackson on February 2, 2010 at 11:22 AM
I like the color versions much better as well.
Posted by Jeff Beard on February 2, 2010 at 11:31 AM
First one gets my vote too. That's really nice work.
Posted by Stan Rose on February 2, 2010 at 12:40 PM
I actually prefer the 'normal' #2 the best, although #1 i a close second. The hdrs just ook a bit cut-n-pasty to me, not necessarily bad, i guess i just prefer the 'traditional' look with this particular subject.
Posted by Momo Vuyisich on February 2, 2010 at 8:00 PM
I like #2 (non-HDR) better, though I would crop it a bit. The B&W is also nice.
Posted by Dan Walters on February 2, 2010 at 9:41 PM
I really like the first one. Shows a little more detail in the sky.
Posted by Paul Wegemann on February 3, 2010 at 9:21 AM
I think I'd actually prefer a blend of the hdr and non hdr. It would still allow for that contrast pop that hdr gives, but allow the naturalness of the scene to come through a bit better.
Posted by Morris McClung on February 3, 2010 at 10:10 AM
I think Paul has a great idea, but I kind of prefer #1.
Posted by Jesse Speer on February 3, 2010 at 12:12 PM
#1 is the most successful, imo. Maybe with the moon a tad brighter. It is still a bit strong there.
Posted by D J Kuklinski on February 3, 2010 at 1:37 PM
It's a toss-up between 1 and 2; leaning towards 1.
Posted by Linnet Long on February 3, 2010 at 11:09 PM
Thanks for your comments, everyone. Sounds like 1 and/or 2, or maybe both blended, or some variations on 1 or 2, are about it
Discussion
11 replieshttp://www.flickr.com/photos/linnetlong/
I'd be interested to know what you think of HDR vs normal vs B&W, etc. I had a great time post-processing
Linnet
Thanks for taking the time to give your thoughts.