Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Wahweap

Discussion

19 replies
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on February 6, 2010 at 3:29 AM
Wahweap
1 - This reminds me of a tree trunk base.

I like these erosion patterns in the soft Entrada siltstones almost as much as the iconic hoodoos, but I don't see them photographed very often.

Wahweap Wash, Grand Staircase of the Escalante, Utah
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on February 6, 2010 at 3:30 AM
#2 - This is not a macro. From bottom to top is about 30 ft.
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on February 6, 2010 at 3:30 AM
#3 The icon - early morning light

Cretaceous Dakota conglomerate capping Jurassic Entrada Sandstone
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on February 6, 2010 at 3:30 AM
#4 - Hoodoo forest
Posted by Paul Wegemann on February 6, 2010 at 9:37 AM
It's an icon, but I never tire of photos of 3 and 4. Nicely done, Bill. I like #1, but I keep thinking a BW treatment would enhance it. This is another place on my ever growing "have to visit" list.
Posted by Todd Caudle on February 6, 2010 at 10:43 AM
Those first two look like fabric! Very cool. I like the "Hoodoo forest" shot even more than the classic icon shot. Neat stuff, Bill.
Posted by Ken Wyatt on February 6, 2010 at 11:04 AM
I agree with Paul, #1 and #2 would look awfully nice in B&W. #3 and #4 are my favorites, mainly because the contrast between the column and background sets it off nicely.
Posted by John Mumaw on February 6, 2010 at 12:39 PM
Excellent series! I enjoy #'s 1 & 4 the most.
However, they all have a slight color cast that keeps them from looking their very best.
I tried using 'Auto Color' in PS on all four of them and the results were brighter whites and cleaner blues.
Posted by Grant Collier on February 6, 2010 at 12:53 PM
I like the unique take on the first two. I think 2 & 4 are my faves.
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on February 6, 2010 at 1:25 PM
Thanks for the feedback guys.

John, I used the default white balance of ~4600K. The warmer tones didn't bother me.

Now that you mentioned it, I did take another look, and I definitely like #1 and #2 better with the cooler tones, ~4300K. However, I still prefer the warmer rendition for #3 and #4.

I think I need to make some prints and live with them for a while. I appreciate the suggestion.
Posted by Brian Jackson on February 6, 2010 at 1:44 PM
Really cool collection.
Posted by Morris McClung on February 6, 2010 at 3:04 PM
Very cool stuff. Im going with #1 and #4 also.
Posted by Don George on February 6, 2010 at 5:24 PM
Real nice set of images. What a strange place. The area never ceases to amaze me.
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on February 6, 2010 at 6:48 PM
#5 - Here's a different exposure of #3
- looser crop
- darker background
- cooler white balance.

Do you guys have a strong preference for either?
Posted by Art Escobado on February 6, 2010 at 8:25 PM
Number#4 contains a strong rhythm, superb composition-the dash of green sprinkled here and there adds to the scene.
Posted by Jackson Frishman on February 7, 2010 at 12:08 AM
Nice stuff, Bill! I prefer the first take on #3. But I really like 1 and 2. They do have quite a vegetable look to them.
Posted by Dan Walters on February 7, 2010 at 2:08 PM
Really like the detail in the second image. I like the warmer light in #3.
Posted by John Mumaw on February 7, 2010 at 9:58 PM
I actually prefer the warmer tones on the hoodoo in the original and the cooler tones of the wall in the revision.
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on February 7, 2010 at 11:21 PM
#6

OK, John. I can't blend those two images since they were different compositions.

So, I made a cooler development of the original and darkened it for more contrast.
It turned out to be far to blue, so I backed off the saturation.
The background was then selected and blended it with the original.

Is this along the lines of what you had in mind? I like it.
Does the blend appear funky to anyone?
Posted by Jeff Beard on February 8, 2010 at 12:19 PM
These are sweet Bill. I really like #4.