Canon 5D, Canon 500mm f4, Gitzo 1548/Arca B1.
1/80 sec @ f16, ISO 1250.
Raw, Full frame, Neatimage, levels, hue/saturation.
Hi,
One from a series of shots from quite a productive session photographing this buck.
I managed to get many full frame portraits with and without the extender on and also switching between the 5D and the 20D for the added advantage of the crop factor.
With the portraits in the bag I decided to try and capture a few shots of the buck in his surroundings.
Posted by David Sewell on March 12, 2010 at 11:47 AM
I do love the backlighting on this. great depiction of the habitat as well.
David
Posted by Rene de Heer on March 12, 2010 at 11:48 AM
And yet another Roebuck.....
As all the others: very nice Justin, lovely setting and a lovely buck, maybe with should call you the Roe (deer) hunter?
Rene de Heer
Posted by Andy Gregory on March 12, 2010 at 11:54 AM
A superb shot. I have neve managed to get that close.
Posted by Mark Davies on March 12, 2010 at 11:58 AM
Got to hand it to you you are becoming an expert with this species .Another super addition.
Arthritis sufferers will view with envy apparantly .
A query why F16 though .
Posted by Mark Green on March 12, 2010 at 12:05 PM
I like this colours in the picture, its a nice contrast, and well composed too.
I agree with mark, interesting settings. I dont know how low the light level were when you took the shot, but i imagine you could have got away with Lower ISO, and smaller ap.
Hi Mark,
I just wanted to try and show a good glimpse of his surroundings and wanted to give a bit more definition to them, hence the small aperture.
I took some at f4, f6.3 and f11 also, but I much prefered this one.
but i imagine you could have got away with Lower ISO, and smaller ap
The majority of the 80 shots from that day were at ISO 200 and ISO 400 and I usually shoot at f6.3, the reason for the settings is expained above. Keeping a low ISO and going with an aperture of f16 would have been really pushing my luck with the shutter speed, hence the 1250 ISO. I didn't want the minimal depth of field, but the opposite.
I don't shoot for agencies so keeping to the lowest ISO's isn't essential and to be honest I find the 5D so capable at ISO 1250 or 1600, using it when it's needed isn't an issue at all.
Posted by Craig Jones on March 12, 2010 at 12:13 PM
Another cracker love the portrait composition and the lighting
Posted by Karen Summers on March 12, 2010 at 12:45 PM
another couple of lovely shots and lovely to see the clear habitat and you did well to use the f16 as it shows the details in the tree above the deer very well and I liked that
Posted by David Taylor on March 12, 2010 at 12:49 PM
Both superb images. I fully appreciate why you used F16 as the deer's immediate environment certainly benefits the DOF produced.
Hi Justin, both are excellent and have their own merits. Super habitat and good comp.
As Mark D said, 'Got to hand it to you you are becoming an expert with this species.' absolutely right!
Congrats
Steve
Posted by eric weight on March 13, 2010 at 6:02 AM
Both superb Justin. It's the cold early morning feel to the light that sets it off for me. Makes me feel like I was there, shivering with cold and excitement. Lots of atmosphere. eric
Posted by Philip Newman on March 13, 2010 at 1:46 PM
Well done Justin, gorgeous composition and habitat.
Discussion
26 replies1/80 sec @ f16, ISO 1250.
Raw, Full frame, Neatimage, levels, hue/saturation.
Hi,
One from a series of shots from quite a productive session photographing this buck.
I managed to get many full frame portraits with and without the extender on and also switching between the 5D and the 20D for the added advantage of the crop factor.
With the portraits in the bag I decided to try and capture a few shots of the buck in his surroundings.
LARGER VERSION
All comments always welcome and appreciated.
David
As all the others: very nice Justin, lovely setting and a lovely buck, maybe with should call you the Roe (deer) hunter?
Rene de Heer
Arthritis sufferers will view with envy apparantly .
A query why F16 though .
I agree with mark, interesting settings. I dont know how low the light level were when you took the shot, but i imagine you could have got away with Lower ISO, and smaller ap.
Mark.G
Hi Mark,
I just wanted to try and show a good glimpse of his surroundings and wanted to give a bit more definition to them, hence the small aperture.
I took some at f4, f6.3 and f11 also, but I much prefered this one.
The majority of the 80 shots from that day were at ISO 200 and ISO 400 and I usually shoot at f6.3, the reason for the settings is expained above. Keeping a low ISO and going with an aperture of f16 would have been really pushing my luck with the shutter speed, hence the 1250 ISO. I didn't want the minimal depth of field, but the opposite.
I don't shoot for agencies so keeping to the lowest ISO's isn't essential and to be honest I find the 5D so capable at ISO 1250 or 1600, using it when it's needed isn't an issue at all.
1/160 sec @ f6.3, ISO 400.
LARGER VERSION
Phil.
Cheers
Terry
2 very good shots.
tony
I hadn't thought of that Phil, but after scrolling the screen up, I think without the sky showing, works well
Its good to experiment and if time permits to make full use of your system.
Major.
Both images are working for me too Justin and as Mr Davies has said, you are taking the lead when it comes to Roe deer images.
Andy...
Paul
As Mark D said, 'Got to hand it to you you are becoming an expert with this species.' absolutely right!
Congrats
Steve
Bob.