Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Scathophaga stercoraria..?

Discussion

20 replies
Posted by Brett Lewis on March 30, 2010 at 9:48 AM
Dung fly Sp. made for a good model for some studio practice recently, since it was very slow moving and could be coaxed onto some white card. So I guess this should be classed as 'controlled' :biggrin:

Brett


Canon 5D MkII, Sigma 150mm/2.8
1/85 @ f8.0, ISO 800
Posted by David Sewell on March 30, 2010 at 9:53 AM
A "controlled" dungfly, now there's a thought...

As you know, this is not my style, but I still recognise a quality macro shot like this when I see it.

David
Posted by John Chapman on March 30, 2010 at 10:23 AM
Hi Brett, this is a great capture. :toast:
Posted by Lewis Thomson on March 30, 2010 at 10:44 AM
Hi Brett,

I can't help with the ID, but its a very well executed shot, nicely done!

Cheers,

Lewis.
:toast:
Posted by Bertl Menegoni on March 30, 2010 at 1:36 PM
I like this sort of images Brett,
only I would wish to have it a bit bigger in the frame,
well done :wavey:
Bertl
Posted by David Taylor on March 30, 2010 at 1:41 PM
A very compliant dung fly allowing you to produce an image that will please a lot of people, but I find the subject too small in the area bounded by the thin line, to emphasise the detail you have captured in the subject. A lot bigger would suit me down to the ground and without any framing, not even round. :biggrin: :biggrin: :wink:

:toast: :toast: :jump:
Posted by Robert Lawrence on March 30, 2010 at 1:49 PM
Cracking shot Brett. It certainly wouldn't harm to have it a bit bigger in the frame.
Posted by Stephen Kaluski on March 30, 2010 at 2:05 PM
Guess you will you be training it Brett over time? Nothing too taxing first off I guess, make tea... :biggrin:

Minimal yes, effective yes, executed very well. Framing, well it fits my mood and probably falls into the 'thirds' rule. Either way, nice one.

Steve :wavey:
Posted by Duncan Armour on March 30, 2010 at 3:34 PM
I think you should have spent a bit more time working on her hair and make-up, and I don't know, but for me that smile looks a bit forced.

Makes a change from the usual camera club studio models anyway.
Posted by Phil Mclean on March 30, 2010 at 4:00 PM
That's a cracking close up,well lit, with a good background but I too would like to see it a little bigger in the frame.

Phil. :toast:
Posted by Maggie Campbell on March 30, 2010 at 4:36 PM
I think at the size it is the detail is amazing. Really like this. :wavey: :smile:
Posted by Guy Rogers on March 30, 2010 at 5:10 PM
Hello Brett.

Super detail and I think this has work really well.

:wavey: :wavey: :wavey:
Posted by Paul King on March 30, 2010 at 7:45 PM
nicely executed shot well done
Posted by Andy Shepherd on March 31, 2010 at 3:15 AM

Superbly done Brett :toast:

Andy...
Posted by Craig Jones on March 31, 2010 at 4:49 AM
Great close up,BG is brilliant,lovely detail :wink: :wink: :wavey:
Posted by Tim Munsey on March 31, 2010 at 4:50 AM
I love this stuff, must get me a pet dung fly!

Tim
Posted by Brett Lewis on March 31, 2010 at 4:55 AM
Thanks Guys.. and a Dung fly as a pet is a novel idea.. Might catch on :wink:

Brett :wavey:
Posted by John Robinson on March 31, 2010 at 6:19 AM
Looks good.
JR
Posted by Jeroen Stel on March 31, 2010 at 9:14 AM
Nice shot with that white BG!
well done!

greetings,

Jeroen Stel
Posted by Matt Cole on March 31, 2010 at 11:37 AM
great technique Brett and a striking shot. Well taken.

Matt :toast:
Posted by Bob Cox on April 2, 2010 at 7:13 AM
All been said , sharp and to the point and an uncluttered back ground which many like.

Bob.