A super image Steve.
Only nit for me is composition. Instead of being drawn to the eye right away I find I'm looking at the tuft of feathers on the back of its head and my eye sits there more easily than it does on the subjects' eye
Posted by Dale Sutton on April 10, 2010 at 8:21 AM
Hi Steve
Works well and got some great detail in there.
Dale
Posted by Philip Newman on April 10, 2010 at 8:45 AM
Different and very effective, like it.
Phil Newman
Posted by eric weight on April 10, 2010 at 11:55 AM
Very nice Steve. It looks good to me cropped from the left as well, just so that tuft is gone. I'd settle for it either way. eric
Posted by Cliff Young on April 10, 2010 at 12:07 PM
Stephen, very effective both composition and processing.
Posted by Phil Mclean on April 10, 2010 at 3:58 PM
I like it Steve.Would it have worked even better if it was reversed horizontally?We read left to right and would then follow the slope of the back and wing up to the eye in a more natural progression.Maybe,maybe not
Hi Phil, I know where you are coming from and in theory, working right to left would be more 'correct', looking into the page, opposed to out. However as it was shot this way I have got so used to it, I feel it tends to sit better this way.
Sometimes correctness goes out the window and you have to just go with gut feeling, right or wrong.
Discussion
12 repliesSteve
MKIII 500f/4 f/4 1/1000 ISO200 (Gitzo tripod/Wimberley head, cropped height)
Only nit for me is composition. Instead of being drawn to the eye right away I find I'm looking at the tuft of feathers on the back of its head and my eye sits there more easily than it does on the subjects' eye
Works well and got some great detail in there.
Dale
Phil Newman
Phil.
Sometimes correctness goes out the window and you have to just go with gut feeling, right or wrong.
cheers
Steve
Works very well for me as is and the detail is excellent.
Cheers
Austin