I think the original is the better shot as the oof antennae is too prominent in the second. Your angle of view and a longish lens has meant you are unlikely to get much more depth of field. I'm afraid I'm unable to offer any constructive advice re the ring flash as I haven't any recent experience. Still a much better macro than I've done.
Posted by Lewis Thomson on April 12, 2010 at 1:40 PM
Hi Barry,
Great detail in the head and a good attempt. The angle that you've shot the subject hasn't helped the dof and the antennas appear transparent, perhaps due to a low shutter speed. I also don't have any experience of ring flash I'm afraid. Keep at it!
Discussion
3 repliesThe hornet is a complex subject and constantly on the move and carries one hell of a sting which I can testify to.
Canon 1D3 Canon 180mm EF f/3.5 Macro USM F/13 ISO 400 tripod
Critique, Comments and Advice most welcome thanks for looking.
This is the cropped head of the hornet.
Hi Barry,
Great detail in the head and a good attempt. The angle that you've shot the subject hasn't helped the dof and the antennas appear transparent, perhaps due to a low shutter speed. I also don't have any experience of ring flash I'm afraid. Keep at it!
Cheers,
Lewis.