Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Hopi Point Slip?

Discussion

13 replies
Posted by Doug Koepsel on April 15, 2010 at 12:49 AM
Hopi Point Slip?
I was reviewing images from Hopi Point taken in February and this was initially overlooked. I like the lighting of the clearing storm clouds and illumination on the opposite features. But, I am unsure that the lighting overcomes the lack of a focal feature and that a different crop may be better.
Posted by Doug Koepsel on April 15, 2010 at 12:50 AM
Here is a vertical crop I was thinking of that focuses on one feature. Thoughts? Suggestions?
Posted by Jack Garrett on April 15, 2010 at 1:17 AM
I think I favor the vertical...nice light!
Posted by Lynn Scott on April 15, 2010 at 2:02 AM
I like them both but the vertical really zero's in. The second shot is very nice!
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on April 15, 2010 at 2:24 AM
I also prefer the vertical composition.
Posted by Grant Collier on April 15, 2010 at 2:43 AM
Another vote for the vert!
Posted by Darren Huski on April 15, 2010 at 6:08 AM
I like them both but I still might crop off the top and bottom of both. Get rid of some of the darker area on the bottom and the clear sky on top.

Go skinny pano on the top one and square on the bottom just to see what they look like.
Posted by Aleksei Saunders on April 15, 2010 at 8:22 AM
I'm with Darren;kinda. I think the light, blue sky conflicts (which isn't always a bad thing) with the mood of the buttes. I'd like to see a crop from above. The scalloped foreground is almost too nice to crop.
:toast:
Posted by Mel Ladewig on April 15, 2010 at 8:58 AM
I think the horizontal is the better comp, but I would push the shadow tones a bit darker. I think the very dark bottom section adds to the image in some way.

Mel-
Posted by John Mumaw on April 15, 2010 at 9:21 AM
Doesn't it feel great to be there during moments like this?
I'm definitely in the vertical camp, as you zeroed in on the best part of the skies and the 'spotlighting' effect.
The areas kissed with snow show up better there, as well.

Posted by Joshua Hardin on April 15, 2010 at 1:14 PM
I like them both, but the horizontal is better IMO. While the vertical crop puts the emphasis on the spotlighting, I think the wide angle of the horizontal has a better "flow" to it by showing more of the swirling clouds above which complement the terrain below quite nicely. I agree with Mel about the shadows.
Posted by Koveh Tavakkol on April 15, 2010 at 1:27 PM
Very cool image. Regardless of if you go with the vertical or horizontal, I would go for a tighter comp like was mentioned above.
Posted by Doug Koepsel on April 15, 2010 at 10:04 PM
The monitor I am using is/was not calibrated, so I downloaded QuickGamma. My monitor may have been too dark before as the calibration adjustment made it brighter; hence my images may seem too light before. So I took a little off the image brightness, added some contrast and mid-range contrast, cropped the upper blue sky out and slightly burned the far left middle highlight that I found distracting. I like the darker inner gorge at the image bottom as it adds depth, and flow from dark to light, to the image, imo.
Posted by Jesse Speer on April 15, 2010 at 10:24 PM
I was going to suggest a square crop of the right side, but then I saw your vertical. Yeah, that works. Although, really, either one works in the end. There's certainly no lack of a primary feature in either version. I'd agree with any comment that suggests a tighter comp.