NPN has moved to naturephotographers.networkYou’re viewing the read-only archive of the original site (2000–2018). The community is active today, with new critiques and discussions every day.
Another from my garden last week. Thanks for the critique on the previous one, and thanks Phil Shaw, I am working on a flash set up.
This image has had the feeder cropped from the RHS. I used the S/H tool slightly to remove some shadow, but was a bit luckier with the sun with this image.
1DS2, 800 sigma, manual at 5.6, and 1/1600, ISO 200, tripod, wimbereley, and doghouse hide.
Critique welcomed.
Best wishes
Phil
An excellent flight shot, I feel your technique is improving with this type of photograph.
Only nit is the background is a bit messy and distracting. If possible setup your feeders to encourage the birds to fly/hover against a more even background.
Also the image looks slightly soft. I suspect the focus point is probably not 100% on the bird but with manual focus setups it is just a case of keep trying until you nail a shot perfectly.
Its a frustrating business, this type of thing, but this shot must be great encouragment for you.
I tend to agree with Phil, that songbird flight photography is well suited to multiple flash. However, i think you could still conjour up a situation that will benifit the natural light method. Possibly shielding the bait/seed etc from certain directions, so the birds only have one obvious flight direction {and therefore more opportunities}, and the use of a reflecter {possibly incorperated into the bait holder} for filling in the harsh shadows that will obviously be present {due to the need for high light levels for a high shutter speed}. I also think that digital 400iso is very usable, and would give you that touch more flexability with dof or shutter.
This is pretty good Phil and a big improvement on your previous post. Using natural light I would use iso800 to give f8 and 1/3200. Provided I have the exposure spot on I find iso 800 to be pretty clean, what noise there is cleans up very well in Neatimage. This is with a 20D.
Why do you manually prefocus? I assumed the 1ds2 af would nail the focus if it was prefocussed at roughly the right distance. Doing some feeder work the other day I noticed the birds would often hover briefly (0.5 -1 second) before alighting on the feeder - isn't that enough time for AF?
I must have a go at this!
John
PS I see you are getting nicely settled in - lucky man!
Nice try Phil and you are certainly getting there, are manually focussing, I can't seem to find any reference in your post to mf?
Agree that the bg is a bit busy for this type of image, a clean complimentary bg seems to work best, some of the succesful examples I have seen involve getting the birds to fly a predetermined path and then prefocussing on that, then firing multiple bursts as they fly into range....
Frank Greenaway did a lot of this type of work using his self built high speed flash system, will quizz him next time I we meet up.
Thanks guys, for the very useful and interesting critique.
Perhaps I should clarify a couple of points.
I seem to be feeding most of the finches on the island! They are eating a huge amount of seed at my feeding stations in the garden, so I thought I would like to experiment with taking some in flight shots. I (stupidly) set up my hide near one of the feeders without a thought of the background , but at least taking in to account light direction and the bird's preferred route. I set up the camera and pre focused on a point about 6 inches from the feeder, setting speed, aperture and focus manually. Each time a bird approached the required flight path I squeezed the remote shutter release.
A bit hit and miss really, but I took about 6 half decent images from 100 shots, and the session lasted about an hour.
It's all a learning curve, but at least the curve is helped by input from others .
Best wishes
Phil
Posted by John Chapman on March 8, 2006 at 5:27 AM
Hi Philip
it is great fun this type of photography and being dig. it costs nothing. I agree with the comments which have been made.
John
Aberdeen
i{ll spare you my ignorance as to the techs as my efforts at such photography were pretty poor, but if you ever get to ecuador i{ll take you somewhere where you can try your newly learnt techniques out on humming birds.......
Discussion
10 repliesThis image has had the feeder cropped from the RHS. I used the S/H tool slightly to remove some shadow, but was a bit luckier with the sun with this image.
1DS2, 800 sigma, manual at 5.6, and 1/1600, ISO 200, tripod, wimbereley, and doghouse hide.
Critique welcomed.
Best wishes
Phil
Barrie
An excellent flight shot, I feel your technique is improving with this type of photograph.
Only nit is the background is a bit messy and distracting. If possible setup your feeders to encourage the birds to fly/hover against a more even background.
Also the image looks slightly soft. I suspect the focus point is probably not 100% on the bird but with manual focus setups it is just a case of keep trying until you nail a shot perfectly.
Good luck getting more shots.
cheers
Sean
Its a frustrating business, this type of thing, but this shot must be great encouragment for you.
I tend to agree with Phil, that songbird flight photography is well suited to multiple flash. However, i think you could still conjour up a situation that will benifit the natural light method. Possibly shielding the bait/seed etc from certain directions, so the birds only have one obvious flight direction {and therefore more opportunities}, and the use of a reflecter {possibly incorperated into the bait holder} for filling in the harsh shadows that will obviously be present {due to the need for high light levels for a high shutter speed}. I also think that digital 400iso is very usable, and would give you that touch more flexability with dof or shutter.
great result
Alan
Why do you manually prefocus? I assumed the 1ds2 af would nail the focus if it was prefocussed at roughly the right distance. Doing some feeder work the other day I noticed the birds would often hover briefly (0.5 -1 second) before alighting on the feeder - isn't that enough time for AF?
I must have a go at this!
John
PS I see you are getting nicely settled in - lucky man!
Agree that the bg is a bit busy for this type of image, a clean complimentary bg seems to work best, some of the succesful examples I have seen involve getting the birds to fly a predetermined path and then prefocussing on that, then firing multiple bursts as they fly into range....
Frank Greenaway did a lot of this type of work using his self built high speed flash system, will quizz him next time I we meet up.
Perhaps I should clarify a couple of points.
I seem to be feeding most of the finches on the island! They are eating a huge amount of seed at my feeding stations in the garden, so I thought I would like to experiment with taking some in flight shots. I (stupidly) set up my hide near one of the feeders without a thought of the background
A bit hit and miss really, but I took about 6 half decent images from 100 shots, and the session lasted about an hour.
It's all a learning curve, but at least the curve is helped by input from others
Best wishes
Phil
it is great fun this type of photography and being dig. it costs nothing. I agree with the comments which have been made.
John
Aberdeen
Tim
nice shot phillip,
i{ll spare you my ignorance as to the techs as my efforts at such photography were pretty poor, but if you ever get to ecuador i{ll take you somewhere where you can try your newly learnt techniques out on humming birds.......
mark.