Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Little Missouri Falls

Discussion

12 replies
Posted by Jon Wisniewski on May 12, 2010 at 12:19 PM
This is a 5 stop HDR that I took on Monday morning. I usually dont like HDR much, but I thought this looked alright when I ran it through Photomatix. The wind wouldn't ever die down totally so there is a little movement in the trees.
Posted by Brad Mangas on May 12, 2010 at 12:31 PM
This is very nice. Photomatix is a great tool to use. It gets a bad rap with all the extreme hdr that folks do with it. When used properly it can produces wonderful natural looks. Great example of what it can do. Well done.
Posted by Joe Rogers on May 12, 2010 at 2:51 PM
Beautiful image, Jon....well blended.
Joe Rogers
Posted by Tom Kennon on May 12, 2010 at 10:20 PM
Jon, great use of Photomax as Brad pointed out. The light in BG pulls your eye through the scene.
Posted by Bryan Simpson on May 13, 2010 at 12:31 AM
Although I've never experimented with HDR, this is a fine example of how to do it properly in my estimation. Aside from that, it's also a well composed image with some great lighting. Beautiful job, Jon!
Posted by Darren Huski on May 13, 2010 at 6:05 AM
At a glance its only the water ripples that give a hint of HDR. Nicely done.
Posted by John Moore on May 13, 2010 at 7:51 AM
Quite an inviting scene Jon; I really like the lighting, colors, and reflection in the pool of water. I need to get down there and spend some more time on the Little Missouri.
Posted by Bill Dark on May 13, 2010 at 9:04 AM
Beautiful greens and some wonderful light in the background. The ripples do look a bit HDRed, but a nice job blending nonetheless. Very nice, Jon.
Posted by Joseph Woodland on May 13, 2010 at 9:26 AM
Guess I'm kind of different - and wondering why HDR was needed in this photo - certainly the dynamic range was well within your sensor's range, wasn't it? The foreground water is really black and looks kind of odd, and the trees and rocks are rather crunchy - I guess this is what HDR does? (I've never used it, but most photos I've seen it used on just looked very unnatural to me - I guess the term is grunge.) The reflected pool looks nice, but the rest of it does not look right to me. Is this what it really looked like? (I bet the unprocessed scene was lovely.)
Posted by Dottie L Lloyd on May 13, 2010 at 11:34 PM
I absolutely LOVE it! After the week I have had, this is the peace I have been longing for! Thank you!
Posted by Karla Hall on May 14, 2010 at 12:03 AM
Jon, I think the HDR added to the scene...It is a well composed picture, but without the extra punch, I feel it would have just been another image...The HDR makes your eye take in every aspect. You did a good job processing it. The only thing in it that bothers me are the rocks to the right. They are a little too defined. I may have done a little blending to mask some of that. Great image! :smile:
Posted by Jon Wisniewski on May 14, 2010 at 1:39 AM
HDR wasn't needed at all in the photo, but it did add a lot of punch (maybe too much) like Karla said. It's fun to play around with every once in a while. I think the foreground water being black is actually the rocks under the water. HDR really makes everything stand out so much more and it is pretty challenging to get it to look natural. Anyways here is a single raw file I worked up that looks normal for comparison:
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4055/4605937704_cf4c33ff0a_o.jpg

Posted by Joseph Woodland on May 14, 2010 at 6:29 AM
Hey Jon - yes, your natural image is much better! Out with the grunge look - save Captan Crunch for breakfast!