Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Red Legged Partridge

Discussion

10 replies
Posted by James Blair on May 25, 2010 at 2:44 AM
Red Legged Partridge
Nikon D300s
70-200, 160mm
is0 200, 1/1600, f2.8

My best! from the weekend, annoyed about the oof branch but cloning just looked messy.
C&C welcome. Thanks.
Posted by David Sewell on May 25, 2010 at 4:12 AM
Hi James,

Personally I would be glad to just get one this far out into the open, never mind the leaf. the bird does look a little soft to me, and I tinhk the image would benefit from a couple more passes of unsharp mask.

David
Posted by Karen Summers on May 25, 2010 at 6:12 AM
I would also love to get one of these especially in the open but I agree about some more sharpening and I would have another go at the cloning as it does spoil a good image
Posted by Ian Macdermott on May 25, 2010 at 6:21 AM
Nice try James :smile:


All nit picking covered
Posted by Phil Mclean on May 25, 2010 at 7:26 AM
A bit more dof than f2.8 and slightly darker may have also helped to turn it from a good portrait into a very good portrait.

Phil. :smile:
Posted by Dale Sutton on May 25, 2010 at 1:09 PM
Nice shot Phil
shame about the leaf on the right and a bit light for my likeing.

Dale :toast:
Posted by Paul Rosser on May 25, 2010 at 1:52 PM
I echo all the above comments.
Paul. :wavey:
Posted by James Blair on May 25, 2010 at 4:20 PM
Thanks for the critiques - all welcomed. Here is the revision - sharpened, darkened (back to the original exposure - I should trust the meter more) and cloned.
Posted by David Sewell on May 26, 2010 at 4:42 AM
It looks a lot better to me.

David
Posted by Karen Summers on May 26, 2010 at 6:11 AM
thats a lot better in my opinion
Posted by keith mitchell on May 27, 2010 at 4:09 PM
James this is very nice,agree about the second.nice!!!
:toast: :toast:
Keith.