Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Longs and Moon #2 w/repost

Discussion

14 replies
Posted by Paul Wegemann on May 31, 2010 at 1:17 PM
Longs and Moon #2 w/repost
I think I prefer this version to my first post. It's a 3 vertical shot stitch. This is a straight-up B&W conversion, but I brightened the moon a slight amount.
Upon further observation, I noticed two climbers on Broadway and 1 on Lady Washington. It's amazing what shows up at 100% view.
Posted by Todd Caudle on May 31, 2010 at 2:12 PM
Boy, I'm not with you on this one, Paul. I much prefer the color version. One fix I'd make to this b&w is to lighten the moon. It looks artificially darker here. I think the whites should match that of the snow on Longs in tonal value.

Can you post a crop and point out the climbers on Broadway? I know they won't be super-recognizable, but I'd love to see what you're seeing -- in color, of course. :smile:
Posted by Joshua Hardin on May 31, 2010 at 3:50 PM
I like it. Although I do agree with Todd that the moon could go even a little brighter. One thing I've noticed on both this and the color version is some sharpening artifacts (or more likely noise that was left over after blurring the sky) along the top of the peak and around the moon. You might need to zoom in and take them out with a blur tool.
Posted by Ken Wyatt on May 31, 2010 at 4:15 PM
Try increasing the contrast here? It seems mostly mid-tone. I agree the moon needs to be much lighter. I like the composition!
Posted by Paul Wegemann on May 31, 2010 at 4:57 PM
Thanks for keeping me honest guys. I brightened up the moon. Let me know if this works or not. Joshua, you have good eyes, and have found a problem I thought I'd fixed. I've been trying to move to a quicker Lightroom workflow for web posting and it just isn't working out. I'm constantly battling artifacts. Thanks for spotting this. Back to PS for me.
Todd, here's an extreme enlargement of the climbers. I have an entire sequence of images where they walk across and disappear into the rocks at the top right.
Posted by Paul Wegemann on May 31, 2010 at 4:58 PM
Here's an extreme blowup of the climbers
Posted by Dan Walters on May 31, 2010 at 7:09 PM
Really like the repost. The moon stands out a little more.
Posted by Morris McClung on May 31, 2010 at 7:11 PM
Yeah, that repost is better for the moon. Wow, the people blow-up show just how dangerous this can be. Nice work!
Posted by Todd Caudle on May 31, 2010 at 7:16 PM
Those guys are CRAZY!

I'd still go lighter on the moon. This isn't gonna sound like it makes any sense whatsoever, but the way it looks now, it looks like a globe, when, counter-intuitively, I think it should look more like a flat disc.
Posted by Jared Atencio on May 31, 2010 at 7:40 PM
I like the extra contrast and seeming sharpness of the repost, but agree w/ TC about the moon. If you could adjust the moon just a tad this would be a truly awesome shot. Those climbers are nuts!-good find!
Posted by Dean Sauskojus on May 31, 2010 at 8:11 PM
Great repost Paul. Great B&W all the way around.
Posted by Jeremy Kessler on May 31, 2010 at 10:28 PM
Great Image, love the repost and thanks for posting the closeup of the climbers, always enjoy seeing mountaineers in their element.
Posted by Joshua Hardin on May 31, 2010 at 11:19 PM
Nice. Repost looks much better on the moon/mountain edges. I think you're getting close on the brightness of the moon too.
Posted by Paul Wegemann on June 1, 2010 at 8:05 AM
Thanks for the feedback guys. I appreciate it.
Posted by Stephen Trainor on June 1, 2010 at 5:37 PM
(Just catching up from the lounge at O'Hare...)

Great alignment you found, Paul! I prefer the B&W, but think the moon would look most natural (to my eye at least) if it were somewhere in between the brightness levels on the two versions above. The rocks look great - lots of detail.