Having got very close and personal with these guys you just do not realise just how tiny they actually are! These guys are, at present, cleaning up their burrows and adding new nesting material into them.
Steve
MKIII 70-200 f/2.8 f/7.1 1/640sec ISO400 (HH, FF)
Actually Matt the only bit of processing was a hint of USM the rest is 'all in camera', but I know what you mean, however that's what I intended, purely to balance the bright, bold vivid bill of the Puffin.
Nice to see the details in the feathers...and a good portrait to boot too. For me its a bit stark, could have done with a bit of thrift in to provide a bit more balance. The DoF works pretty good, apart from the tail feathers but the background is glorious.
Nice detail in the plumage. There looks to be a cyan colour cast on the face due probably due to shading and it extends to the underside whites as well; I think the image would look better if this were corrected in processing.
Beautiful portrait, Steve. Lovely colours, great detail and the puffin stands out very well. The only minor nit for me, is the tightness on the left side. Do yo have some space left there?
Re DOF spot on for me as I just felt all in focus and you would be looking more at his butt being the closest part, than the head. Phil see what you mean, just a fraction off, thanks. Sandra, I think you mean rhs, sadly no.
Discussion
14 repliesSteve
MKIII 70-200 f/2.8 f/7.1 1/640sec ISO400 (HH, FF)
Matt
I like the out of focus back and foreground, it makes the puffin stand out very well
well done
Ron
Central eye position works well with this look back from the Puffin. I like the light coming through the beak.
Cheers
Austin
Brett
Would have probably liked the mush at the bottom to extend all the way to the right but that is just a personal choice not a nit.
Cheers,
Chris
Hi Steve,
Thats a cracker! DoF is fine for me also, I agree with Chris about the half mush half not, but not much you could do there.
Cheers,
Lewis.
Ian
Re DOF spot on for me as I just felt all in focus and you would be looking more at his butt being the closest part, than the head. Phil see what you mean, just a fraction off, thanks. Sandra, I think you mean rhs, sadly no.
Steve