Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

and they get smaller still

Discussion

11 replies
Posted by Barry Southon on June 17, 2010 at 12:11 AM
and they get smaller still
One of the smallest species I have encountered I was drawn by the contrasting colours.

Canon 1D3 handheld 180mm ISO 400 ringflash. RAW to lightroom then resized to post.

Critique, Comments or Advice most welcome.

Thanks for looking.
:wink:
Posted by Chris O'Reilly on June 17, 2010 at 4:31 AM
Hi Barry

Good colourful image but I feel the composition lets it down. By placing the subject in the centre you've included a lot of blank space to the top and left - this doesn't really add anything to the shot. I'd have preferred to see the subject on the left, higher in the frame and more of the flower.
Hope this helps.

Cheers,
Chris
Posted by John Robinson on June 17, 2010 at 5:45 AM
Good attempt Barry.
As a matter of interest it doesn.t look too bad rotated 90% left !
Looks like one of the hairstreak family.
Cheers
JohnR
Posted by Barry Southon on June 17, 2010 at 9:59 AM
Thanks chaps just what I needed, I tend to click away gathering as many species as possible, without giving any thought to composition. Where as composition is an art in it's self. I'll implement the suggestions.
:wink:
Posted by Karen Summers on June 17, 2010 at 11:16 AM
I am sure you can sort out the comp Barry, still enjoyed viewing it beautiful colour in this image
Posted by Barry Southon on June 17, 2010 at 11:18 AM
Having implemented your suggestions I can see the improvement.
:wink:
Posted by Andy Astbury on June 17, 2010 at 11:28 AM
Well Barry I'm not going to comment on the comp, but for me at least, this has got to be one of your best processed images to date matey - well done :toast: :toast:
Posted by Barry Southon on June 17, 2010 at 11:39 AM
Andy

Thank you a compliment indeed, I'm getting a bit long in the tooth and teaching an old dog new tricks takes time.
:wink:
Posted by Mark Davies on June 17, 2010 at 4:10 PM
2nd image a vast improvement .
Posted by Brett Lewis on June 17, 2010 at 6:06 PM
Agree, 2nd is best and you just need to get a little more perpendicular to your subject and that will lift the game a bit more..

Brett :toast:
Posted by Maggie Campbell on June 17, 2010 at 7:01 PM
Second image is much better Barry. I can empathise with you regarding composition. It is easy once you see it done as it should be but spotting it yourself while processing is not so easy.

Agree with JR, definitely a member of the Hairstreak family. Probably in my book but at this time of night I can't be bothered to look - sorry :wink: :wavey:
Posted by eric weight on June 18, 2010 at 1:39 PM
Hairstreaks are not the easiest butterflies to get shots of because they spend so much of their time high in the tree canopy, so you did well to get this and you have made a fine job of it too.
:toast: eric