Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Common Blue

Discussion

8 replies
Posted by Joe Stockwell on June 21, 2010 at 5:01 PM
sadly I haven't had a huge amount of time to work on my photos recently, but with a mass of images to Go through I though I'd share this one from earlier in the month.

Comments welcome

Canon 40D, Canon 70-200 + tube.

ISO800, 1/500th, F8 :smile:
Posted by Craig Jones on June 22, 2010 at 2:28 AM
Very nice and I like the different composition you have chosen here Joe,love the BG and colours :wink: :wink: :wavey:
Posted by Phillip Tomkinson on June 22, 2010 at 5:42 AM
Hi Joe it,s a nice image but dosn't work for me.

Phil.

:toast: :wavey:
Posted by Brian Davis on June 22, 2010 at 11:40 AM
Its a lovely shot. I wonder if it would have worked for Phil if it had been the other way up? Would have been better critique if he'd said why it didnt work. My only comment would be could it be a little brighter do you think?
:toast:
Posted by Heath McDonald on June 22, 2010 at 12:33 PM
Hi Joe, a very nice shot and one of my favourite subjects. My preference for this kind of shot, is having the butterfly higher up in the frame, recomposing so that the grass is a bit further to the right, this will give you a bit more room. I don't know what type of tripod head you are using, but you could try tilting the lens in the tripod collar so that the grass is more from the top right to the bottom left, this would give you a bit more space for the butterfly nearer the top of the frame.

Otherwise nice colours and dof looks good.

regards

Heath :toast:
Posted by Andy Shepherd on June 22, 2010 at 2:29 PM

Hi Joe,

You have some good advice there from Heath, don't think I can add anything else to that, like the shot BTW.

Andy...
Posted by John Robinson on June 22, 2010 at 7:37 PM
Joe
It does actually look better flipped the other way up. You could be a purist and say
"but this is how it was "
Good point and a can of worms too !
I can't see a lot wrong with it but it doesn't hit you between the eyes.It lacks a little "punch" and I agree comments like " doesn't work for me" are not that useful sometimes without some helpful reasons. This forum can be hard Joe - Have faith !!
:biggrin: :wink: :wink: :cool: :cool:
Cheers
JohnR
Posted by eric weight on June 23, 2010 at 11:21 AM
The technical nits have been covered already, but I would just add that I think it would have paid to look for one in better condition. Heath's advice is good advice imo and this is not that far away from being a really good shot, it just needs a little polishing in the technique I'd say.
I have been out with one or two, what I believe to be really good macro photographers recently and the first thing you notice is that they pay very, very close attention to detail and that is what makes the difference between being 95% of the way there and 100%.

:toast: eric
Posted by Joe Stockwell on June 24, 2010 at 7:58 AM
Thank you very much for your comments, I have a few more images to work on and I will post them soon.

Joe