Two waterfall shots from a little bit different perspectives. I tried my best to make the compositions interesting on both, as well as keep the processing similar. I am curious as to which shot you guys like better and more importantly why? Thanks in advance for your C&C!
Posted by Jack Garrett on July 29, 2010 at 10:21 AM
I like number 1 because of that neat red colored rock and moss. The foreground in number 2 is a little to blurred for my tatstes...jut one mans opinion though.
Posted by Erik Aagaard on July 29, 2010 at 10:23 AM
#1. I much prefer its foreground in this one.
The out of focus foreground in #2 is really distracting to me. Not sure if it's blur from the water (because the rock in the LL corner appears sharp) rather than out of focus, but the effect is the same.
Posted by Pam Colander on July 29, 2010 at 10:34 AM
#1 for the above reasons. Pretty location!
Posted by Dan Baumbach on July 29, 2010 at 10:42 AM
I'd like them both. I like the water in the foreground of the second one. I'd have to see prints to make a real determination.
- Dan.
Posted by Brian Jackson on July 29, 2010 at 11:23 AM
#1 is a keeper. Sweet shots!!
Posted by Jack Garrett on July 29, 2010 at 11:30 AM
Hey Koveh...do you mind sharing what lens and settings you used on this one? One thing I didn't mention is that I like how you eliminated the sky on these.
I really like both, if I have to pick I will maybe pick the 2nd one. They both have immediate foreground which makes the viewer much closer to the scene but the 2nd one has more depth to it and the shadow on the cliffs is less prominent. In general rocks anchor the image better but I really love the water in this case. Most people can get close to rocks easily, but not water. Both great images in any case!
Do I have to choose? OK, #1 by a nose. Both are really cool. Is this in the Columbia Gorge? Which Falls?
Posted by Doug Koepsel on July 29, 2010 at 1:12 PM
I prefer #2 as the foreground leads me to the falls.
In #1, the red rock stops my view there. I wonder if a slightly higer POV would have helped in that regard.
Agree with the rest re: #1.
If the foreground had been sharp with #2, then it would have won my heart easily.
I think it would be an asset were you to slightly desaturate the reds in #1. It's almost over thetop, especially in relation to the more muted colors in the rest of the image.
Wow, both are excellent. I guess if I had to pick one it would be the first just because of that excellent foreground material. I also like #2 because of the lines and I actually like the trippy feeling in the the water.
Oh, this is an easy one--#2 of course! The red/orange rock in #1 is too eye-catchin, it just blocks the great view of the falls. The lines in #2 are all radial, and take your eye back to the sharp falls. Both good shots, but #2 rocks!
Posted by Kurt Bowman on July 30, 2010 at 12:22 PM
WOW...love them both for reasons others already stated, hard to choose, but would say #1 by a slim margin. I think if you would have had something in focus in the FG in the second one (like a rock as an anchor point), I would have chosen that one for the depth. With the FG being the blurred water from the long exposure, it just makes it a bit funky.
Discussion
23 repliesThe out of focus foreground in #2 is really distracting to me. Not sure if it's blur from the water (because the rock in the LL corner appears sharp) rather than out of focus, but the effect is the same.
- Dan.
In #1, the red rock stops my view there. I wonder if a slightly higer POV would have helped in that regard.
If the foreground had been sharp with #2, then it would have won my heart easily.
I think it would be an asset were you to slightly desaturate the reds in #1. It's almost over thetop, especially in relation to the more muted colors in the rest of the image.
Dave, this is the same falls from Jared's post a few down, honestly not too sure what the actual name is though.