Posted by Stephen Weaver on September 25, 2010 at 10:54 PM
Here are the Bells from Tuesday morning
Posted by Jack Garrett on September 25, 2010 at 11:11 PM
Not too sure what's going on here Steve but this looks way over sharpened or maybe too much contrast....hard to give this one an A+ Maybe a repost would help.
Posted by John Mumaw on September 25, 2010 at 11:37 PM
Something has gone awry with the processing here, I'm afraid.
Posted by Stephen Weaver on September 25, 2010 at 11:51 PM
This is a three exposure blend and NOT over sharpened. The print is excellent , which is how ultimately I evaluate my work. The speckles in the water are floating debris.
Posted by Jody Grigg on September 26, 2010 at 1:16 AM
The trees on the left look good but the mountains do not look so good. I don't think anybody is saying anything about the debris Steve.
Posted by Jack Garrett on September 26, 2010 at 1:43 AM
Hope I didn't offend you Steve...you have some of the best images I've seen on here. If the print looks good, that's what really matters. It's not the debris, there is just something about the mountains that seems off. Your Bells image from a few years ago absolutely rocks!!
Posted by Stephen Weaver on September 26, 2010 at 10:00 AM
No problem Jack. I think this is just a jpeg/compression issue and differences among monitors. The full size file has tons of detail, and as I said the print is quite nice. Nothing earth shaking or original here. I just wanted to show you guys what it was like this week. I will never top the image I shot there with 4x5 back in 1999
Discussion
6 repliesThis is a three exposure blend and NOT over sharpened. The print is excellent , which is how ultimately I evaluate my work. The speckles in the water are floating debris.