I realise this is a bit tight in the frame, it was taken a few years ago when I was obsessed with getting right in close with my new telephoto lens We've all been there haven't we? oh, ok, just me then
This is a square crop from a landscape format image, I cropped just a little from the bottom as the fish tails were missing anyway, to concentrate on the face more.
Top and right are as shot.
Taken on Skomer Island in West Wales, UK with my old 6 Mp Minolta DSLR.
Minolta Dynax 7D
Sigma 50-500 EX
1/800th sec
f6.3
ISO 200
500mm
-0.7 stop exposure compensation
Centre-weighted metering
Hand held
Great detail in the shot. The beak and sand eels are the main focus in this one and I don't have a problem with that, depends on what you intend to portray (though I expect some may prefer the Puffins eye to be more in focus).
Posted by eric weight on October 2, 2010 at 2:14 AM
I'm afraid I do still like close as possible shots, In fact I bemoan the fact that I can't get as close as I want to very often. I like this shot, but it does show up the difficulties regarding depth of field when you are up close and personal. I reckon you've made a really good job of this Graham. The detail is tremendous and I find it fascinating - you can even see the marks on the eels where the bird has repositioned them in its bill. I think that focussing on the bill/fish rather than the eye was a good choice for this shot as well. Thumbs up from me. eric
I've always wonderd how they catch more fish when the bill is already closed on the first one without letting it go - anybody know?
Posted by Barry Southon on October 2, 2010 at 4:40 AM
Geoffrey
This image is so powerful and the detail is great. I fail to see any problem with the close in shots and of this exceptional quality. This also highlights the difference between USA and the UK schools US close in seems to be the predominant totally accepted format. Where as on this forum time and again it seems to be the contrary. From the views expressed no doubt they reflect individual taste. I'm all for "MIX and PIck" why not.
Posted by Neil Burton on October 2, 2010 at 4:45 AM
I just love seeing the feather detail and scales of the fish....yes, call me old fashioned but that is a stonker.
Posted by David Kjaer on October 2, 2010 at 6:48 AM
I love it Geoffrey - all the right bits are sharp!
Discussion
14 repliesThis is a square crop from a landscape format image, I cropped just a little from the bottom as the fish tails were missing anyway, to concentrate on the face more.
Top and right are as shot.
Taken on Skomer Island in West Wales, UK with my old 6 Mp Minolta DSLR.
Minolta Dynax 7D
Sigma 50-500 EX
1/800th sec
f6.3
ISO 200
500mm
-0.7 stop exposure compensation
Centre-weighted metering
Hand held
I've always wonderd how they catch more fish when the bill is already closed on the first one without letting it go - anybody know?
This image is so powerful and the detail is great. I fail to see any problem with the close in shots and of this exceptional quality. This also highlights the difference between USA and the UK schools US close in seems to be the predominant totally accepted format. Where as on this forum time and again it seems to be the contrary. From the views expressed no doubt they reflect individual taste. I'm all for "MIX and PIck" why not.
David
Cheers,
Chris
Calum
David
Very nice portrait and the detail on the Sandeels and beak is superb.
Lee
I like big head shots.
JohnR