Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Yellow hammer.+repost

Discussion

10 replies
Posted by keith mitchell on October 15, 2010 at 3:29 PM
Yellow hammer.+repost
Nikon d200
Sigma50-500
1/125@f7.1
iso500
C&C please. :smile:
Cloned a little mush at the top of the perch
Posted by Neil Burton on October 15, 2010 at 3:55 PM
All works perfectly for me except the small circle top right...cloned out spot?
Posted by Dale Sutton on October 15, 2010 at 3:58 PM
looks fine to me bar the circle already mentioned.

Dale
Posted by Karen Summers on October 15, 2010 at 4:01 PM
lovely looking bird great colour but can see traces of cloning, worth another try
Posted by David Sewell on October 15, 2010 at 5:15 PM
The squarish format does not work for me, otherwise a great shot of one of my bogey birds, except for that round spot!

David
Posted by Mike Smith on October 16, 2010 at 3:33 AM
certainly worth another go at the processing, apart from the obvious cloning brush marks TR and around the subjects throat there are 3x other hard circle cloning or dust bunnies in the lower part of the image as well.

Posted by keith mitchell on October 16, 2010 at 3:51 AM
Thanks for looking and your comments,is this any better.
Keith :smile:
Posted by Phil Shaw on October 16, 2010 at 7:19 AM
I'm not sure what you've done to version 2, but you've lost some sharpnes and contrast, and introduced a large radius halo around the perch and underparts of the bird. I suspect you've made the cloning changes to the low-res jpg file and you have lost image quality when the jpg has been re-saved. Once you have created and saved a jpg file it is never a good idea to open it and re-save it. You can open it and close it as often as you like without losing image quality but don't re-save the file. If you need to make changes you have to make them on the saved .tif or .psd file and then reconvert to a new jpg if you want to maintain highest quailty in your workflow.

I can also still see two dust-spots in the lower left corner, otherwise, it is an attractive image, although I would prefer space to the right so that the subject is not so central.
Posted by Des Ong on October 16, 2010 at 10:37 AM
Crop works for me but prefer original Keith.

Rgds,

Des
Posted by David Kjaer on October 16, 2010 at 12:56 PM
Minor nits aside a very nice image taken in nice light with a beautiful BG.

David :toast:
Posted by Kim Connolly on October 16, 2010 at 1:15 PM
It's a beautiful bird Keith, and the problems are very minor. Like it very much. :toast: