Hey Des, as you asked so nicely, it would be rude not to post.
'LBR' - Lilac-Breasted Roller a very colourful bird and striking bird when in flight. The slight weight of the bird managed to move this branch slightly out, avoiding any others creeping into camera.
Steve
MKIII 70200f/2.8 1/200 f/4 ISO200 (HH almost FF) - Botswana
Posted by James Blair on October 16, 2010 at 11:55 AM
Beautiful detail and colours of this fantastic bird.
Posted by Dale Sutton on October 16, 2010 at 1:38 PM
A stunner Stephen great detail.
Dale
Posted by Austin Thomas on October 16, 2010 at 2:28 PM
Hi Steve,
That is what you call a blue sky background. These are such colourful birds and great details have been captured in camera. I like the detail seen in the eye in particular.
I am a little surprised at the techs given the light. "Only" 1/200th, which I appreciate is fast enough to render it sharp but given the blue sky I would have expected more ss from a 2.8 lens. Did you have a polariser in place?
Hi Austin yes CP used, but prefer not as it can dull the colouring at times, omitted 0 in 1/200, should have been 2000 Best, as you know, to get them in- flight, the Indian ones have an almost 'tan' chest, but prefer these. Will aim to get more next year, plus some Malachite too, LOL.
Steve
Posted by David Kjaer on October 17, 2010 at 5:50 AM
Hi Steve
Cracking bird well captured.
David
Posted by Brian Davis on October 17, 2010 at 10:09 AM
Discussion
6 replies'LBR' - Lilac-Breasted Roller a very colourful bird and striking bird when in flight. The slight weight of the bird managed to move this branch slightly out, avoiding any others creeping into camera.
Steve
MKIII 70200f/2.8 1/200 f/4 ISO200 (HH almost FF) - Botswana
Dale
That is what you call a blue sky background. These are such colourful birds and great details have been captured in camera. I like the detail seen in the eye in particular.
I am a little surprised at the techs given the light. "Only" 1/200th, which I appreciate is fast enough to render it sharp but given the blue sky I would have expected more ss from a 2.8 lens. Did you have a polariser in place?
Cheers
Austin
http://www.austin-thomas.co.uk
Hi Austin yes CP used, but prefer not as it can dull the colouring at times, omitted 0 in 1/200, should have been 2000
Steve
Cracking bird well captured.
David