Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Arches/Canyonlands

Discussion

30 replies
Posted by Stan Rose on November 8, 2010 at 12:16 PM
Arches/Canyonlands
Just couldnt make it out to Zion this year, so i consoled myself with a quick trip out to A&C this weekend. A bit too rushed to really make it work, especially after i found out that the road i wanted to head down was 'impassable' (Mineral Creek was also wiped out a couple months ago). But heres a sampler:
1) Classic view of the Fisher Towers
Posted by Stan Rose on November 8, 2010 at 12:17 PM
2) Delicate Arch vicinity at sunrise
Posted by Stan Rose on November 8, 2010 at 12:18 PM
3) Arches near courtyard towers
Posted by Stan Rose on November 8, 2010 at 12:18 PM
4) Chesler Park, Needles district
Posted by Stan Rose on November 8, 2010 at 12:19 PM
5) Colorado overlook, Needles
Posted by Stan Rose on November 8, 2010 at 12:20 PM
6) Windows area, sunrise yesterday
Posted by Stan Rose on November 8, 2010 at 12:20 PM
7) Windows, sunrise!
Posted by Stan Rose on November 8, 2010 at 12:21 PM
8) Plenty of color still in Arches...
thats all for now--maybe one more at ESS :wavey:
Posted by Joe Rogers on November 8, 2010 at 1:12 PM
Like all of them, but, #3 has a balance that really works for me. Thanks for posting.
Joe Rogers
Posted by Justin Peterson on November 8, 2010 at 3:23 PM
Great series, Stan. I love this area of the country. For a rushed trip, you got some keepers (I like #1, 4, 5, and 6).
Posted by Soubhik Patranabis on November 8, 2010 at 3:25 PM
Nice set of images Stan.
Posted by Joseph Kayne on November 8, 2010 at 4:25 PM
Looking good.....the reds looka little bit oversated on the first image on my work monitor...Neat images.
Posted by Guy Schmickle on November 8, 2010 at 5:51 PM
A very nice series, Stan. Of course your best one is over at ESS. I agree with Joseph that the reds on #1 are pushed a bit too far.
Posted by Stan Rose on November 8, 2010 at 6:10 PM
Yeah, i think they might be a bit too strong--i didnt push them, but i needed to pull back, as i did in this version:
Posted by John Mumaw on November 8, 2010 at 7:28 PM
I really like #2 !
Great light, and the varied striations are quite engaging for the eye.
Posted by Doug Koepsel on November 8, 2010 at 8:45 PM
I am drawn to #5 most, maybe because it sucks me into the canyon depths and the spire in the center. But I also wonder how it would look with the sun in the opposite direction and taken from the lower rock on the right.

#4, the cedar snag covers the spired rocks behind.
#2 is kinda Second Wave-ish in a good way
Posted by Rohn B. McKee on November 8, 2010 at 9:17 PM
These are all just beautiful Stan. thanks for sharing
Posted by Jack Garrett on November 8, 2010 at 9:30 PM
Another excellent series Stan..hard to pick a favorite because they are all so good!
Posted by Jack Garrett on November 8, 2010 at 9:32 PM
Another excellent series Stan..hard to pick a favorite because they are all so good!
Posted by Lance Warley on November 9, 2010 at 6:39 AM
I love #1. Arches is oversaturated, unless we allow that Mother Nature can't get it wrong. lol.

I also love the b&w's. So stark and other worldly.

Great job, Stan.
Posted by Richard Voninski on November 9, 2010 at 10:10 AM
#7 looks like a bomb went off in the distance. Great stuff. Hoping to get out there myself sometime soon too.

RichieV
Posted by Paul DeCesare on November 9, 2010 at 12:42 PM
Definitely several keepers here. #5 does something good that can be a challenge for me, it really captures the feeling of depth. I've struggled with that up at Colorado National Monument in the past.

Hey, the tones on your B&W inages are succulent... did you just muck around in Photoshop or do you use something like Silver EFEX? If you tell me would you have to kill me? :biggrin:
Posted by Bill Brennan on November 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM
Great series, Stan.

Bill Brennan
Posted by Jim Bennett on November 9, 2010 at 2:33 PM
Another great series, Stan. It always helps when the sky and the lighting cooperate!
Posted by Stan Rose on November 9, 2010 at 4:34 PM
Paul: Thanks, i just muck with PS, i wish i had some spare change for Siver Effex! I think the key for me is that first, I composed with B&W in mind (for example, the tree in 4 was an obvious B&W subject--unfortuantely i misjudged my tripod height and left some overlap :rolleyes: ) and second, I follow Guy T's advice and process in color first, sometimes tweaking the color a bit with the final B&W conversion in mind (for example, using a gradient curve in the sky so that the fg object stays distinct from the bg when i added a slight red filter effect). Its a constant learning process--that is for sure! I hope you can check out a B&W i will post tomorrow on ESS, since its an extreme example of this strategy... :wink:
Posted by Morris McClung on November 9, 2010 at 10:17 PM
That pull back on the reds in your last post really worked great. Do that on the first one and it will be incredible. Nice series overall with a good variety of scenes and the b&w mixed in. The conversions look like old school b&w. Very cool. #'s 1 and 5 would be my picks.
Posted by Ken Wyatt on November 10, 2010 at 12:28 AM
I agree your trip was very productive. The Towers are exceptional. One thing I've discovered is that red channel is easily oversaturated when shooting the red rock areas in early/late light. I normally have to back off a bit.
Posted by Pam Colander on November 10, 2010 at 1:01 PM
Red can get out of control and I like the "pulled back" reds in your last image. Lots to love in your series...in fact, ALL of it :toast:
Posted by D J Kuklinski on November 11, 2010 at 3:31 PM
Personally, I like the reds in the first one. :cool:
Great series, Stan!
Posted by Brian Jackson on November 11, 2010 at 6:44 PM
Like #1 and #7.
Posted by Jason J. Hatfield on November 18, 2010 at 1:18 AM
Great color in the first one.