Posted by Stan Rose on November 8, 2010 at 12:16 PM
Just couldnt make it out to Zion this year, so i consoled myself with a quick trip out to A&C this weekend. A bit too rushed to really make it work, especially after i found out that the road i wanted to head down was 'impassable' (Mineral Creek was also wiped out a couple months ago). But heres a sampler:
1) Classic view of the Fisher Towers
Posted by Stan Rose on November 8, 2010 at 12:17 PM
2) Delicate Arch vicinity at sunrise
Posted by Stan Rose on November 8, 2010 at 12:18 PM
3) Arches near courtyard towers
Posted by Stan Rose on November 8, 2010 at 12:18 PM
4) Chesler Park, Needles district
Posted by Stan Rose on November 8, 2010 at 12:19 PM
5) Colorado overlook, Needles
Posted by Stan Rose on November 8, 2010 at 12:20 PM
6) Windows area, sunrise yesterday
Posted by Stan Rose on November 8, 2010 at 12:20 PM
7) Windows, sunrise!
Posted by Stan Rose on November 8, 2010 at 12:21 PM
8) Plenty of color still in Arches...
thats all for now--maybe one more at ESS
Posted by Joe Rogers on November 8, 2010 at 1:12 PM
Like all of them, but, #3 has a balance that really works for me. Thanks for posting.
Joe Rogers
Posted by Joseph Kayne on November 8, 2010 at 4:25 PM
Looking good.....the reds looka little bit oversated on the first image on my work monitor...Neat images.
Posted by Guy Schmickle on November 8, 2010 at 5:51 PM
A very nice series, Stan. Of course your best one is over at ESS. I agree with Joseph that the reds on #1 are pushed a bit too far.
Posted by Stan Rose on November 8, 2010 at 6:10 PM
Yeah, i think they might be a bit too strong--i didnt push them, but i needed to pull back, as i did in this version:
Posted by John Mumaw on November 8, 2010 at 7:28 PM
I really like #2 !
Great light, and the varied striations are quite engaging for the eye.
Posted by Doug Koepsel on November 8, 2010 at 8:45 PM
I am drawn to #5 most, maybe because it sucks me into the canyon depths and the spire in the center. But I also wonder how it would look with the sun in the opposite direction and taken from the lower rock on the right.
#4, the cedar snag covers the spired rocks behind.
#2 is kinda Second Wave-ish in a good way
Posted by Rohn B. McKee on November 8, 2010 at 9:17 PM
These are all just beautiful Stan. thanks for sharing
Posted by Jack Garrett on November 8, 2010 at 9:30 PM
Another excellent series Stan..hard to pick a favorite because they are all so good!
Posted by Jack Garrett on November 8, 2010 at 9:32 PM
Another excellent series Stan..hard to pick a favorite because they are all so good!
Posted by Lance Warley on November 9, 2010 at 6:39 AM
I love #1. Arches is oversaturated, unless we allow that Mother Nature can't get it wrong. lol.
I also love the b&w's. So stark and other worldly.
#7 looks like a bomb went off in the distance. Great stuff. Hoping to get out there myself sometime soon too.
RichieV
Posted by Paul DeCesare on November 9, 2010 at 12:42 PM
Definitely several keepers here. #5 does something good that can be a challenge for me, it really captures the feeling of depth. I've struggled with that up at Colorado National Monument in the past.
Hey, the tones on your B&W inages are succulent... did you just muck around in Photoshop or do you use something like Silver EFEX? If you tell me would you have to kill me?
Posted by Bill Brennan on November 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM
Great series, Stan.
Bill Brennan
Posted by Jim Bennett on November 9, 2010 at 2:33 PM
Another great series, Stan. It always helps when the sky and the lighting cooperate!
Posted by Stan Rose on November 9, 2010 at 4:34 PM
Paul: Thanks, i just muck with PS, i wish i had some spare change for Siver Effex! I think the key for me is that first, I composed with B&W in mind (for example, the tree in 4 was an obvious B&W subject--unfortuantely i misjudged my tripod height and left some overlap ) and second, I follow Guy T's advice and process in color first, sometimes tweaking the color a bit with the final B&W conversion in mind (for example, using a gradient curve in the sky so that the fg object stays distinct from the bg when i added a slight red filter effect). Its a constant learning process--that is for sure! I hope you can check out a B&W i will post tomorrow on ESS, since its an extreme example of this strategy...
Posted by Morris McClung on November 9, 2010 at 10:17 PM
That pull back on the reds in your last post really worked great. Do that on the first one and it will be incredible. Nice series overall with a good variety of scenes and the b&w mixed in. The conversions look like old school b&w. Very cool. #'s 1 and 5 would be my picks.
Posted by Ken Wyatt on November 10, 2010 at 12:28 AM
I agree your trip was very productive. The Towers are exceptional. One thing I've discovered is that red channel is easily oversaturated when shooting the red rock areas in early/late light. I normally have to back off a bit.
Posted by Pam Colander on November 10, 2010 at 1:01 PM
Red can get out of control and I like the "pulled back" reds in your last image. Lots to love in your series...in fact, ALL of it
Posted by D J Kuklinski on November 11, 2010 at 3:31 PM
Personally, I like the reds in the first one.
Great series, Stan!
Posted by Brian Jackson on November 11, 2010 at 6:44 PM
Discussion
30 replies1) Classic view of the Fisher Towers
thats all for now--maybe one more at ESS
Joe Rogers
Great light, and the varied striations are quite engaging for the eye.
#4, the cedar snag covers the spired rocks behind.
#2 is kinda Second Wave-ish in a good way
I also love the b&w's. So stark and other worldly.
Great job, Stan.
RichieV
Hey, the tones on your B&W inages are succulent... did you just muck around in Photoshop or do you use something like Silver EFEX? If you tell me would you have to kill me?
Bill Brennan
Great series, Stan!