Lovely detail John. Only minor nits for me are a little big in the frame and not keen on the square crop Otherwise a cracker
Posted by Karen Summers on November 16, 2010 at 4:44 PM
colour and detail is lovely
Posted by Ian Mason on November 16, 2010 at 5:01 PM
Gorgeous directional light shows off the plumage very nicely. The eye is great. I agree just a little tight.
Posted by Ian Macdermott on November 16, 2010 at 5:09 PM
Apart from the stray leaf under your sig and the missing foot John
its a cracker
Posted by Ian Mason on November 16, 2010 at 5:35 PM
Gorgeous directional light shows off the plumage very nicely. The eye is great. I agree just a little tight.
Posted by Ian Mason on November 16, 2010 at 5:58 PM
Gorgeous directional light shows off the plumage very nicely. The eye is great. I agree just a little tight.
Posted by Geoffrey Baker on November 16, 2010 at 6:24 PM
What a lovely Kingfisher image, the colours are amazing
Well done John.
Geoff.
Posted by John Robinson on November 16, 2010 at 6:30 PM
Thanks all
Spent the past two hours trying to get more space around the bird as most suggested,. I only had one other shot and it was the same size in the frame. I have had to create more background. Not sure if the effort was worth it. What do you think.
Cheers
JohnR
Posted by Lee fisher on November 16, 2010 at 8:13 PM
Much prefer version two John. Its a quality shot all round
Lee
Posted by Neil Burton on November 17, 2010 at 4:03 AM
Posted by Chris O'Reilly on November 17, 2010 at 9:41 AM
I didn't know you could use Fuji Velvia with digital John!
A very attractive image - the second comp for me, all day long.
Cheers,
Chris
Posted by Kim Connolly on November 17, 2010 at 10:21 AM
Both fabulous John, but if I was pushed - then the second for me too.
Posted by Phil Mclean on November 17, 2010 at 11:40 AM
I too prefer the 2nd one John.
But I am amazed nobody's mentioned the amputated foot yet!
Phil.
Posted by John Robinson on November 17, 2010 at 12:17 PM
Go to the top of the class !! I wondered how long it would be.
I know I should have left the first one alone instead of trying to enlarge the canvas
I tried to use the only other shot I had with more canvas on but I should have spent three instead of two hours
Cheers
JohnR
Discussion
20 repliesSomething different about this one but can't work out what it is.
D200
Sigma 100-300
400 ISO
125th sec @f9
Slight crop.
Levels
JR
its a cracker
Well done John.
Geoff.
Spent the past two hours trying to get more space around the bird as most suggested,. I only had one other shot and it was the same size in the frame. I have had to create more background. Not sure if the effort was worth it. What do you think.
Cheers
JohnR
Lee
The second image really works.
Bags of detail and the composition is spot on. The effort was worth it.
Shaun
A very attractive image - the second comp for me, all day long.
Cheers,
Chris
But I am amazed nobody's mentioned the amputated foot yet!
Phil.
I know I should have left the first one alone instead of trying to enlarge the canvas
I tried to use the only other shot I had with more canvas on but I should have spent three instead of two hours
Cheers
JohnR