Archive
NPN has moved to naturephotographers.networkYou’re viewing the read-only archive of the original site (2000–2018). The community is active today, with new critiques and discussions every day.
Visit NPN today →
Nature Photographers Network

Little Owl

Discussion

16 replies
Posted by Mark Hancox on November 22, 2010 at 2:03 PM
Little Owl
Caught me a bit by suprise so a bit tight in the frame , Canon 1D MKIV SIGMA 300-800 ISO 1600 f6.3 shutter 1/1250 ex comp -2/3 , Thanks to all who have taken time to comment on the images I have posted in my short time on this forum , Its been an experience .. .. cheers
Posted by Shaun Simpson on November 22, 2010 at 2:35 PM
Might have taken you by surprise but still a superb shot, nice one :toast: :toast: :toast:
Posted by Ian Mason on November 22, 2010 at 3:06 PM
Fantastic! Really dramatic action. By the way, I stumbled across a few of your prints in an outlet up North before you started posting here. I called my wife over to admire them - they were absolutely outstanding.
Posted by Paul Rosser on November 22, 2010 at 3:21 PM
It may have caught you by suprise, but you caught it really well!! :toast: :toast:
Regards,
Paul Rosser. :wavey:
Posted by Karen Summers on November 22, 2010 at 5:06 PM
Shame its a tad tight but a great pose
Posted by Oscar Dewhurst on November 22, 2010 at 5:10 PM
Agree about it being tight, but otherwise fantastic! :toast: :toast:

Oscar :wavey:
Posted by Geoffrey Baker on November 22, 2010 at 5:17 PM
Well, you nailed the shot anyway, well done :smile:

Geoff.
Posted by Ian Haskell on November 22, 2010 at 5:40 PM
Looks pretty good Mark. Lovely.

Would like to see some information on how you process your high ISO shot - your presentation of these files are spot on.

Your shots give me something to aspire to.

Ian
Posted by Shaun Boycott-Tayl on November 23, 2010 at 3:54 AM
Hi Mark,

Nit already covered. Fantastic action shot all the same. Talons fully extended and the concentrated look on the Owls left eye and its posture makes for a fine image.

Superb :toast: :toast:

Shaun :wavey:
Posted by keith mitchell on November 23, 2010 at 4:07 AM
Tight bit covered but hey what a superb shot.
:toast: :toast: :toast:
Keith.
Posted by Sandra Hendrikse on November 23, 2010 at 4:23 AM
Nit already covered, but other than that a great action shot. :smile:
Posted by Mark Hancox on November 23, 2010 at 4:26 AM
Just wondering if you get a prize for saying " nit covered " ...
Posted by Chris O'Reilly on November 23, 2010 at 6:46 AM
Bit tight in the frame - nit covered. I guess if the owl was pouncing on something then the crop wouldn't be too tight. Nice action.

Cheers,
Chris
Posted by Dave Bartlett on November 23, 2010 at 7:35 AM
Not something I would mind getting surprised by. Spot on and given the type of action and direction of travel its not too tight in the frame for me. Unfortunately, this means I don't get the $1 'nit covered' subscription rebate this time .. :biggrin: :toast:
Posted by Mark Hancox on November 23, 2010 at 8:55 AM
Hi Chris , Its full frame top to bottom hence its too tight in the frame not from cropping ..
Posted by Phillip Tomkinson on November 23, 2010 at 9:06 AM
Very nice.

Phil.

:toast: :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast: :wavey:
Posted by simon manning on November 26, 2010 at 1:13 PM
Fantastic shot :toast:

Simon