Posted by Ken Wyatt on December 21, 2010 at 2:30 PM
Lunar Eclipse, Garden of the Gods Park - After meeting with fellow photographers, Bob Falcone and Jim Van Hoy in the main GoG parking lot, Sheila and I spent the better part of the night last night (and this morning!) photographing the total lunar eclipse. It was fascinating to watch the full moon with its bright light casting shadows around us, with near full visibility...to near total darkness, in a matter of several minutes. I had set up two cameras - one with a 300 mm / f2.8 (and 1.4X teleconverter) on my Canon T2i body, in order to obtain close-ups of the moon itself. The other one was set up in a fixed location near the Tower of Babel rock formation, hooked up to an intervelometer shutter release, set to fire every 8.5 minutes. The primary purpose of this one was to capture a sequence of moon shots, which would later be combined into a single frame showing the moon at different stages of eclipse. The 8.5 minutes was calculated such that none of the moon images would overlap. The tripod was located such that the sequence would have arced directly over the rocks.
This is one frame from that sequence, showing the moon as its just coming out of the umbral stage. The slight sliver of crescent moon is causing a "starburst" effect, which I thought was unique. This was photographed using my Canon 5D with 24 to 70 mm /f2.8 lens (adjusted to 30 mm) and set to ISO 800, 30 second exposure at f5.6. It was slightly adjusted with Lightroom to bring up the shadow detail in the rocks. I also applied sharpening and noise reduction to clean up the sky. Because of the 30 second exposure, if one were to magnify this image, you'd be able to see slight arcs in the stars, due to the earth's rotation. The light on the rocks is from the natural ambient light from the nearby building in the main parking lot where we were located.
Note that focussing any lens at night (especially during a total eclipse) is troublesome. If your camera body has a "live view" mode (or equivalent), where you can see the actual image via the LCD screen, it's possible to set focus on bright objects, such as the moon or stars. You'll want to switch to Manual focus, so that successive shots don't end up defocussing the lens. For camera bodies without "live view", it's tougher. It's generally best to prefocus the lens during the day or early evening, switch to Manual focus and tape the adjusting ring down with gaffers tape. This assumes there will be no drastic temperature changes, as this can affect the focus point (mainly on large telephotos). For these lunar shots, I set the exposure to Manual and diddle around until I get proper exposure for the moon. To see stars well, you'll want to set the aperture for around f4 to f5.6 and the ISO to a setting where they start to show well in the LCD screen. The shutter speed should be 15 to 30 seconds for good detail. If you're fortunate enough to have some foreground, it can be light-painted with a strong flashlight during the exposure.
Hope you like it! May post a few more later...
Ken
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on December 21, 2010 at 2:49 PM
It's great to see a wider shot with foreground. I'm looking forward to a compsite of your sequence.
You are fortunate to have had clear skies throughout. But hey, I can't complain. It's better to get a last minute clearing vs none at all.
Very cool, Ken and I really like your techie description. The image is simple and intriguing, just right for night work.
Posted by John Mumaw on December 21, 2010 at 6:26 PM
As a night image, this is great. Looks like a typical full moon, though.
Posted by Joshua Hardin on December 21, 2010 at 7:26 PM
I like your ideas and description Ken. Seems like your technique to capture this type of event is solid. I can't wait to see what you come up with if you work on combining those exposures in Photoshop to show the full progression of the eclipse over the Garden.
Posted by Doug Roane on December 21, 2010 at 11:29 PM
excellent!
Posted by Kalin Wilson on December 22, 2010 at 4:04 AM
I'd like to see your time-lapse composition. I'd thought about doing a time-lapse of some sort but I didn't get to GoG until the eclipse was almost full. I'd forgotten about it until my wife reminded me. I was surprised how many people/photogs were out.
I wish I could have used live view to check focus but not enough light.
What intervelometer are you using? I've been looking at the promote control for time-lapse and HDR work.
Posted by John Mumaw on December 22, 2010 at 3:44 PM
"What intervelometer are you using?
I know you were asking Ken, but I thought I'd volunteer what I use...this 'digital timer remote' from Amazon for over a year now taking multiple 30 sec. exposures for star trails, and it's worked extremely well during that time.
Not as many features as the PC, but a great price for what it does.
Posted by Ken Wyatt on December 22, 2010 at 7:57 PM
I'm using the Canon TC-80N3 Timer Remote Controller. Thanks for the comments so far. And thanks to Kalin and John for chiming in with some alternatives.
Kalin, we were probably working side-by-side for a while. It's tough to identify people in pitch dark, though!
Posted by Bob Falcone on December 22, 2010 at 8:45 PM
Great shot, Ken! It was good seeing you again...I'm still wading through my shots, but I don't have anything that looks this nice!
Discussion
9 repliesThis is one frame from that sequence, showing the moon as its just coming out of the umbral stage. The slight sliver of crescent moon is causing a "starburst" effect, which I thought was unique. This was photographed using my Canon 5D with 24 to 70 mm /f2.8 lens (adjusted to 30 mm) and set to ISO 800, 30 second exposure at f5.6. It was slightly adjusted with Lightroom to bring up the shadow detail in the rocks. I also applied sharpening and noise reduction to clean up the sky. Because of the 30 second exposure, if one were to magnify this image, you'd be able to see slight arcs in the stars, due to the earth's rotation. The light on the rocks is from the natural ambient light from the nearby building in the main parking lot where we were located.
Note that focussing any lens at night (especially during a total eclipse) is troublesome. If your camera body has a "live view" mode (or equivalent), where you can see the actual image via the LCD screen, it's possible to set focus on bright objects, such as the moon or stars. You'll want to switch to Manual focus, so that successive shots don't end up defocussing the lens. For camera bodies without "live view", it's tougher. It's generally best to prefocus the lens during the day or early evening, switch to Manual focus and tape the adjusting ring down with gaffers tape. This assumes there will be no drastic temperature changes, as this can affect the focus point (mainly on large telephotos). For these lunar shots, I set the exposure to Manual and diddle around until I get proper exposure for the moon. To see stars well, you'll want to set the aperture for around f4 to f5.6 and the ISO to a setting where they start to show well in the LCD screen. The shutter speed should be 15 to 30 seconds for good detail. If you're fortunate enough to have some foreground, it can be light-painted with a strong flashlight during the exposure.
Hope you like it! May post a few more later...
Ken
You are fortunate to have had clear skies throughout. But hey, I can't complain. It's better to get a last minute clearing vs none at all.
I wish I could have used live view to check focus but not enough light.
What intervelometer are you using? I've been looking at the promote control for time-lapse and HDR work.
Not as many features as the PC, but a great price for what it does.
Kalin, we were probably working side-by-side for a while. It's tough to identify people in pitch dark, though!