Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Red Squirrel

Discussion

12 replies
Posted by Tom_W on April 8, 2006 at 7:02 AM
Red Squirrel

300mm/HH
F3.2/250asa/320'
Levels,(USM(150,0.2.1)*2
Fully width,pano 3:1

Debated whether or not to use flash, decided against it an when for the nore natural scene but the light on a coniferous forest floor at this time of year is problematic. Should I have used FiF?

T
Posted by Kevin Lewis on April 8, 2006 at 7:11 AM
yup :) but I think this could be lifted in ps to give it a punch using curves?
Posted by Tom_W on April 8, 2006 at 7:18 AM
You could do this, (possible slightly overdone) but I am struggling with the fact that this isn't what I saw :frown: (I'm having one of those anti PS days :biggrin: )
Posted by John Chapman on April 8, 2006 at 12:24 PM
Hi Tom
I prefer the second one as it lightens the mood of the scene. Like the Pano scene.
John
Aberdeen :wavey:
Posted by Clive_S on April 8, 2006 at 1:03 PM
The pose, head turn and catchlight are spot on Tom.

My vote is for #2 as well - the first just looks too dour on this screen.
Looks like it's been dreech with you too? :rolleyes:
Posted by Sean Bolton on April 8, 2006 at 1:54 PM
Hi Tom

I found fill flash tricky with Red Squirrels as they give red-eye extremely easily, I have attached an example. I guess this can be overcome in Photoshop. This was with flash gun mounted on camera and flash comp set to -1.6.

I like the pano composition, you have positioned the squirell well in the frame. And great ear tufts as well, they were largely non-existant when I photographed red squirrels at Formby in November last year.

Is this Formby?

cheers

Sean
Posted by Dave Courtenay on April 8, 2006 at 2:57 PM
The first time i photographed red squirrels i used flash and have since renamed them the squirrels from hell as all had red eye,Your squirrel Tom is beautiful with those fantastic ear tufts,I would only use flash with a diffuser and off camera as a last resort,The pano format works very well and both images with and without PS work are ok for me,Although i think i would go with the original,I presume this was at formby,Next time try a reflector im sure the squirrels will be ok with it :toast:
Posted by Mick Crowe on April 8, 2006 at 3:06 PM
Hi there Tom,
I may be the odd one out here but I much prefer the first one as the lighting look's far more natual.
Mick
Posted by Rob Howard on April 8, 2006 at 5:02 PM
Hi Tom,

I'm with the first one as well. Lovely little creatures.

Regards

Rob
Posted by John Varley on April 9, 2006 at 4:36 PM
Very nice Tom - the first one works best for me - John
Posted by PhilH on April 10, 2006 at 3:33 AM
Another fine pano Tom... I have an anti PS day every day when I switch my computer on at work :biggrin:

second one looks better to me and I don't think you needed fill, on mammals it often looks wrong and your image portrays the 'forest' setting nicely.

:toast:
Posted by Paula Graham on April 11, 2006 at 2:47 PM
Funny, on my laptop screen the first one looks nicer and more punchy. I do like the pano crop and the setting very much. Very appealing shot.
Posted by Elliott Neep on April 12, 2006 at 6:35 AM
Hi Tom,

Like the pano format a lot. Works really well with th squirrel stretched out on the ground. Prefer the first shot for its natural mood. Have tried reflectors at Formby as Dave C suggested and they work well, especially with a off-camera, diffused flash bouncing off. Squirrels are a bit jerky at first, but soon ignore it if there is a plentiful supply of hazelnuts.

Might see you there again soon!

Elliott