Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Fungus..

Discussion

7 replies
Posted by David Taylor on January 7, 2012 at 11:04 AM
Fungus..
..on a rotting log. Taken yesterday at Dunham Massey.

An anaglyph so red/cyan glasses to view in 3D.

Fuji W3 3D camera.
ISO 100
Processed with StereoPhotoMaker


:toast: :toast: :jump:
Posted by Nick Mckeown on January 7, 2012 at 12:04 PM
Haven't got any funny specs but to be honest the image looks pretty good to me as is.........in a weird sort of way.....very absract.

Nick. :toast: :toast: :smile: :wavey: :toast: :toast:
Posted by PhilH on January 7, 2012 at 2:32 PM
A very interesting image David, I feel that perhaps the 'separation' is just a little too great and wonder what it would look like with a touch less depth... gosh we seem to have a whole new part to image critique now...... methinks I might have to post an image of my setup for Stereo pairs at work... all micrometer driven in all directions and angles :razz:

:toast: :wavey: :toast:
Posted by keith mitchell on January 7, 2012 at 2:57 PM
Hi David.
It's got the look of a Coral reef to me without the funny glasses,agree with Nick and i like it.

Keith.
Posted by John Robinson on January 7, 2012 at 3:59 PM
Like Phil says a bit "dramatic" but one of your best !
John
Posted by David Sewell on January 8, 2012 at 1:28 PM
I have got the specs, and it really pops for me. The only trouble is that there seems a bit too much depth of field, the recession seems greater than you would get in real life. I guess I am agreeing with Phil.

David
Posted by Phil Ellard on January 8, 2012 at 1:35 PM
took a moment to get there but loved it maybe dramatic but isnt that teh point of 3d loved it :toast: :toast:
Posted by David Taylor on January 8, 2012 at 5:26 PM
Thanks for commenting folks. :wavey:

PhilH. I'd love to see the image your professional set-up for stereo pairs, please post as soon as possible. I think your comment about the 'separation' may be valid for individuals are are used to looking at 2D images most, or all, of the time. In my case I feel the separation is just about right as I am increasingly finding that 2D images, no matter how good, are, oh so, flat. The log, oak I think, was about two feet in diameter.

2012, I feel, is going to be an exciting year for the 3D and hologram enthusiast, I urge anybody reading this to give it a go and
prepare to amaze yourself what can be produced.

David, thanks for investing in the specs. :wavey: I'll try to keep the anaglyphs coming.

Phil E. Your right about the drama of 3D, I think it is great. :cool: :biggrin: :wink:

PS The 3D video I took at the firm's belated Christmas Party, last night, has wowed everyone I have showed it to (for all the right reasons I hasten to add). :biggrin: :wink:

:toast: :toast: :jump: