Posted by Nick Mckeown on February 17, 2012 at 4:50 PM
Nikon D7000 105mm f2.8 macro ISO 200 1/250s at f10 sb-400 flash fill tripod
This scotch argus was photograhed just after it had flown up onto a plant stem to warm itself in the first rays of the sun and still had dew on its head. Its wings were held forward so I decided to do a side on shot. I like the pose and the detail of the dew etc but those OOF wing spots seem distracting to me and seem to spoil the image. Obviuosly I cannot clone them out. What do you think?
Nick.
Posted by Dawn Monrose on February 17, 2012 at 5:04 PM
Hi Nick, I like this. The oof wings means your attention is drawn to the super sharp head covered in dew. It's something a bit different, but you can still tell what it is if you see what I mean. I don't find the wing spots distracting - they echo the sparkle of the dew drops. I'm not so keen on the square crop myself, I'd probably go for a portrait.
It's a nice shot that really reminds me of summer - can't wait!
Posted by Nick Mckeown on February 17, 2012 at 5:11 PM
Thanks Dawn I was in two minds about the crop and have a vertical comp too........ which looks better?
Nick.
Posted by Matt Cole on February 17, 2012 at 5:17 PM
Hi Nick, I'm not keen on the OOF wing I'm afraid. It dominates the image too much for my liking. Great looking butterfly though
Matt
Posted by Ian Macdermott on February 17, 2012 at 5:20 PM
Hi Nick,
Lovely shot and really good detail on the head.
The purist will not like the oof wing but for me it's no big deal.
Posted by Dawn Monrose on February 17, 2012 at 5:22 PM
Hi Nick, I much prefer the vertical format, it somehow satisfies the eye with the vertical 'perch'. Just my opinion! Perhaps makes it a little tight in the frame? The more I look at this the more I like it.
Just noticed the beautiful metallic coppery sheen in the 'hairs' - lovely!
Posted by Nick Mckeown on February 17, 2012 at 5:23 PM
Thanks for your honesty Matt.............. that is my feeling but it is nice to get other opinions. I did try at f16 but it didn't make too much difference to the wing as the spots were still OOF.
Nick.
Posted by Rene de Heer on February 17, 2012 at 5:41 PM
I am with Matt, the oof wing is too obvious, maybe better head on! But i suppose thats easier said then done!
Rene de Heer
Posted by John Robinson on February 17, 2012 at 6:23 PM
I have to agree with Matt and as a natural history shot it does'nt work for me. The spots are just too dominant.
JR
Posted by Bob Johnson on February 18, 2012 at 3:07 AM
Hi Nick. The spots hit me the second the pic loaded up.
Having said that it has grown on me and the dew and hairs are 'spot on'
Bob
Posted by Andy Shepherd on February 18, 2012 at 4:44 AM
Hi Nick,
The portrait repost is better, but needs more space around the SC, room the breath so to speak. I think the BG is perfect with some very complimentary colours and the water droplets look very good. Providing you have the room theres a very nice image to be had from this.
Andy...
Posted by Nick Mckeown on February 18, 2012 at 6:08 AM
Thank you very much for all your honest opinions. It is an image I will never get printed but will keep on my files nevertheless. If nothing else it will remind me of that glorious morning when the field had knee deep mist and a very heavy dew that had me soaked in seconds.
Nick.
Posted by Roy Bailey on February 18, 2012 at 7:52 AM
I like the detail you have dew spots and background, not so much wings so much out of focus.
Posted by Paul Whippey on February 18, 2012 at 1:05 PM
Superb detail in this shot Nick. The dew drops especially. But I have to agree the DOF needs work and the OOF wing dominates too much for me. I've not tried focus stacking as yet, but maybe that would be a solution for shots like this? As long as the subject stays still of course!
Posted by Nick Mckeown on February 18, 2012 at 1:35 PM
Thanks Roy & Paul for your comments, greatly appreciated as always. Focus stacking would be tricky as the butterfly started to open its wings as the suns warmth started to take hold. The joys of macro!
I'm no macro shooter but from a purely aesthetical point of view the oof spots are too distracting. The dew detail and the background however are excellent.
Posted by Craig Jones on February 19, 2012 at 6:58 AM
First image for me its a lovely image with great details, colours and composition and the oof areas does not bother me one bit
Discussion
16 repliesThis scotch argus was photograhed just after it had flown up onto a plant stem to warm itself in the first rays of the sun and still had dew on its head. Its wings were held forward so I decided to do a side on shot. I like the pose and the detail of the dew etc but those OOF wing spots seem distracting to me and seem to spoil the image. Obviuosly I cannot clone them out. What do you think?
Nick.
It's a nice shot that really reminds me of summer - can't wait!
Nick.
Matt
Lovely shot and really good detail on the head.
The purist will not like the oof wing but for me it's no big deal.
Just noticed the beautiful metallic coppery sheen in the 'hairs' - lovely!
Nick.
Rene de Heer
JR
Having said that it has grown on me and the dew and hairs are 'spot on'
Bob
Hi Nick,
The portrait repost is better, but needs more space around the SC, room the breath so to speak. I think the BG is perfect with some very complimentary colours and the water droplets look very good. Providing you have the room theres a very nice image to be had from this.
Andy...
Nick.
Nick.