Colour correct hare?

Discussion

20 replies

Posted by Neil Burton on February 27, 2012 at 4:48 PM

The hare, now calibrated and saved with a profile...as god intended and all that.

Posted by John Robinson on February 27, 2012 at 4:52 PM

Neil
Same as no 1 on the blog ?
Looks fine to me.
I don't get all this tecky stuff

Cheers
JR

OOps sorry forgot to mention - thought of a vertical crop to add a bit of impact ?
Just my thoughts others will have theirs.

Posted by Neil Burton on February 27, 2012 at 5:08 PM

You see to me now looking with Firefox it is green....all green...like a green filter has been used :o What the hell?

Saved for web, embedded profile, sRGB I do not get it.

Looks great in windows photo viewer...seems to be the profile which is throwing it?

Posted by John Robinson on February 27, 2012 at 5:41 PM

Well I don't get it either but there is no green excess in the near whites at all on my gear.
I'll try firefox.
JR
Addition- tried Firefox and looks exactly the same- fine
JR

Posted by Tom Smit on February 28, 2012 at 12:18 AM

Also looks good to me, also in FF.
Nice shot

Posted by PhilH on February 28, 2012 at 3:17 AM

Looks good here too... I don't use Firefox, but I beleive it is the only profile aware browser for windows, but I think you have to enable the option...

Posted by Neil Burton on February 28, 2012 at 4:08 AM

Here is how it looks to me at home :| As close as I can approximate here at work.

Posted by Ian Macdermott on February 28, 2012 at 6:24 AM

Looks fine to me on a calibrated monitor at home using chrome or safari on my iPad.

Posted by Neil Burton on February 28, 2012 at 6:34 AM

OK, thanks.

Posted by David Sewell on February 28, 2012 at 7:10 AM

Looks fine to me as well, either using FF on an uncalibrated monitor at work or Safari on a calibrated iMac at home.

David

Posted by Neil Burton on February 28, 2012 at 8:39 AM

OK, so I can pretty much trust PS and what I see.... hopefully WPOTY jusdes can too :|

Cheers to all!

Posted by Phillip Tomkinson on February 28, 2012 at 8:57 AM

Hi Neil it's a nice image, but they both look the same in chrome & firefox as I have both on my PC you can get Safari which is colour aware for PC, I used to use it but like chrome better, you can make chrome colour aware which is what I have done.

Phil.

Posted by PhilH on February 28, 2012 at 10:18 AM

'OK, so I can pretty much trust PS and what I see.... hopefully WPOTY jusdes can too'....

Yep... all calibrated and profiled... the latest Eizo screens in a controlled environment... trust me...

Phil

Posted by Mike Smith on February 28, 2012 at 10:34 AM

Profiling aside I think I would have preferred a portrait crop on this one as teh eye connection is dead straight

Posted by Andy Shepherd on February 28, 2012 at 11:13 AM

Looks good at my end too, tis a fine Hare shot, though I do agree about cropping to portrait. Good work Mr Burton.

ps: Love the new logo

Andy...

Posted by Neil Burton on February 28, 2012 at 11:19 AM

Yes the crop will be changed, I processed this with the space for text in mind. Thanks guys.

Posted by Neil Burton on February 28, 2012 at 11:19 AM

Yes the crop will be changed, I processed this with the space for text in mind. Thanks guys.

Posted by David Taylor on February 28, 2012 at 11:30 AM

I'm using NetSurf on my ARMini RISC OS computer and the first image looks a fine portrait to me and I can see the difference between IE and FF in the second. IE looking more to my taste.

Posted by Rene de Heer on February 28, 2012 at 3:52 PM

Looks fine to me, nice image and I also prefer a vertical crop.
Rene de Heer

Posted by Nick Mckeown on February 28, 2012 at 3:56 PM

No idea what the @*%$ you are talking about tech wise but I love the hare shot! Verti shot might be good too!

Nick.

Posted by Neil Burton on February 28, 2012 at 5:11 PM

I have no idea either, but all seems to work better now...apart from Internet explorer over saturating still. But not at work, so I now it is only me! Thanks all.