Posted by Phillip Noll on February 27, 2012 at 10:54 PM
I've been struggling with this one for a while now. Had problems with color casts, and it just seems flat to me. Would appreciate any suggestions to improve this. Thanks!
Posted by Ken Henke on February 27, 2012 at 11:10 PM
The first thing that struck me was the bed of the river being a very reddish brown color. Was that the actual color?
Posted by John Mumaw on February 27, 2012 at 11:15 PM
A couple of things you could try, Phil.
Try that Image Polish technique (USM: Amount-25; Radius-50; Threshold-0).
Or you can try playing with a Selective Color adjustment layer.
For example:
In Reds, I moved the Black slider left to around -10.
In Yellows, I moved the Magenta slider left to -24.
In Blues, I moved the Black slider to left to -15.
This is a real nice image worth 'developing' just a bit further.
Posted by Morris McClung on February 28, 2012 at 9:11 AM
The falls section looks good to me, maybe bring up the leaves a little. The top half just needs a little pop, and John's suggestions always work for me. It's a very nice image.
Posted by Kane Engelbert on February 28, 2012 at 11:18 AM
Hi Phil, with the upper 3rd, try isolating that area, then use the highlight slider in Curves and drag it to the right to taste. Should add a little pop to this already beautiful image. Is the colorcast in the whites? If so, try isolating white in selective color and adjusting the hue.
Always interesting hearing about everyone's different approaches to processing! Some things I'd try (I rely on Tony Kuyper's techniques a lot):
Selectively painting in some glow or Orton into the upper third
Some dodging of the background trees, maybe targeting just the light tones
Some very light dodging of the upper falls and canyon to help the eye get there from the lighter tones at the bottom and maybe help with the sense of depth
Posted by Erik Aagaard on February 28, 2012 at 9:40 PM
Have you considered cropping just above the falls, leaving only a small amount of yellow above the water? To me, there are almost two images here fighting for attention, and the bottoom 2/3 is by far the more compelling. Just a thought...
Posted by Phillip Noll on February 28, 2012 at 10:57 PM
Thanks for the suggestions! I tried them all. Here is a slightly reworked version. The difference is subtle. Still not all that happy with it. Maybe I should start from scratch!
Posted by John Mumaw on February 28, 2012 at 11:28 PM
I like the changes you implemented here.
Where more 'pop' (for lack of a better word) needs to occur is in the group of trees in the upper left quadrant, IMO.
If that is even possible.
Posted by Phillip Noll on February 28, 2012 at 11:38 PM
Thanks, John! On my calibrated monitor it look far better than it does here. Perhaps going to sRGB and jpeg mute the colors some. I think I'll keep working it.
Posted by Scott Fricke on February 28, 2012 at 11:45 PM
I agree with John on the trees. The leaves on the trees on the right edge of the image are very vibrant while the ones on the left are fairly dull in comparison. I do like the composition quite a lot and it is certainly worth your efforts.
Discussion
14 repliesTry that Image Polish technique (USM: Amount-25; Radius-50; Threshold-0).
Or you can try playing with a Selective Color adjustment layer.
For example:
In Reds, I moved the Black slider left to around -10.
In Yellows, I moved the Magenta slider left to -24.
In Blues, I moved the Black slider to left to -15.
This is a real nice image worth 'developing' just a bit further.
Selectively painting in some glow or Orton into the upper third
Some dodging of the background trees, maybe targeting just the light tones
Some very light dodging of the upper falls and canyon to help the eye get there from the lighter tones at the bottom and maybe help with the sense of depth
Where more 'pop' (for lack of a better word) needs to occur is in the group of trees in the upper left quadrant, IMO.
If that is even possible.