Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Peregrine II

Discussion

17 replies
Posted by David Sewell on March 23, 2012 at 8:44 AM
Peregrine II
Those who disagreed with me about eye-level shots in my last upload were right, as I hope this upload demonstrates. Another comment I got was that the eye needed lightening. The same is true in this shot, but in both I have pushed it as far as I can. It is possible to shoot at this site to get the light right on the eye, but I will save that for my next posting. :cool:

Despite what I have said about the eye in this shot, it is the eye contact that made me decide to post this one. Probably most apparent in the larger version.

Thanks for looking, and for all the comments on my last post.

David

Nikon D300, 600mm Nikon, 200 ISO, 1/1600th @ f8
Posted by Matt Cole on March 23, 2012 at 8:49 AM
the eye looks fine on this one to me David as there is a clear catch light which gives it some life. This is very nice, I like the pose, it's nice and sharp and the blue sky is the final touch.

Matt :toast:
Posted by Neil Burton on March 23, 2012 at 9:15 AM
Nice catchlight in the eye, works rather well. :toast:
Posted by Stephen Kaluski on March 23, 2012 at 9:25 AM
Well seen, but especially captured, based on the species David. Certainly the bigger version does your camera skills justice, very well executed. :toast:

Might suggest looking at an alternative crop as it's a little too central I feel, so may be less above and to the right, allowing the bird room to fly into the LH space? Just my 2 cents.

TFS
Steve
Posted by David Sewell on March 23, 2012 at 9:44 AM
Thanks, Steve. An interesting point of view. I chose to crop with the eyes central as I thought it suited the way the bird is staring at me. However, I have tried Steve's suggestion and also gone in a little closer, and quite like it. Which crop do others prefer?

David
Posted by Robert Lawrence on March 23, 2012 at 10:01 AM
The second for me David. Another excellent in flight shot.
Posted by Mike Smith on March 23, 2012 at 10:04 AM
Central crop for me as per the original post and thinking - the strong eye contact results in no need for the empty space to left for bird to fly into.
Posted by John Robinson on March 23, 2012 at 11:04 AM
I think Iagree. Maybe somewhere between the two. Cracking shot whatever . Especially the biggie !
JR
Posted by Dave Bartlett on March 23, 2012 at 12:57 PM
I would go for the second one, but both are very good. Great eye!

Dave
Posted by Matt Cole on March 23, 2012 at 1:45 PM
I prefer the second actually David. It's a lovely shot.

Matt
Posted by Guy Rogers on March 23, 2012 at 2:44 PM
Hello David.

Excellent capture and I also like the second one better.

:wavey: :wavey: :wavey:
Posted by Nick Mckeown on March 23, 2012 at 3:10 PM
Its a close call but I think the second has it. Its at times like this I am glad I am not a pigeon! Cracking image!

Nick. :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast: :wavey:
Posted by Andy Shepherd on March 23, 2012 at 3:17 PM

First one for me, David. The strong diagonal works well with the central comp. Nicely done.

Andy...
Posted by Cliff Young on March 24, 2012 at 2:45 AM
I'd also go with the first, possibly with a slightly closer crop. Either way both nice in flight shots. Cliff
Posted by Bob Johnson on March 24, 2012 at 4:25 AM
They both have their attractions. For me the second one has the bird just a little tight into the corner :wink:

Bob :smile:
Posted by Barry Southon on March 24, 2012 at 12:18 PM
David

A cracking shot the second has the edge fro me.
:wink:
Posted by Rene de Heer on March 25, 2012 at 10:07 AM
Number 2 for me. Great shot of this fantastic raptor.
Rene de Heer
Posted by David Taylor on March 29, 2012 at 5:26 PM
Both are excellent. :-)