Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Blackcock in sunlight

Discussion

19 replies
Posted by John MacTavish on May 3, 2012 at 12:19 PM
Blackcock in sunlight
Last frame I shot before the birds decided to fly off.
The first shots I took 2 hrs before this one were at ISO 1600 and even wide open, shutter speed was a lowly 0.5sec. Amazing how quickly the light changes at dawn

Like the over the shoulder look.
No apologies for being big in the frame, it's how I shoot them.

1D3
400/2.8L IS
1/1000
f/3.5
ISO200
Posted by Nick Mckeown on May 3, 2012 at 12:21 PM
Great light John and the pose works really well. Whereabouts are you?

Nick.
:toast: :toast: :smile: :wavey:
Posted by John MacTavish on May 3, 2012 at 12:23 PM
Benderloch, near Oban, Nick
:wavey:
Posted by Nick Mckeown on May 3, 2012 at 12:37 PM
John we are almost neighbours...I am near Glencoe! If you fancy meeting up sometime PM me with your contact details.

Nick.
Posted by Graham Goddard on May 3, 2012 at 1:11 PM
The smaller image doesn't do this justice as detail is lacking that is abundant in the bigger image - love the pose, colours and BG John :toast: :toast:
Posted by John Robinson on May 3, 2012 at 1:33 PM
Prefer this to the other one John.
Good stuff.
JR
Posted by Oscar Dewhurst on May 3, 2012 at 3:59 PM
Superb light and colours :toast: :toast:

Oscar :wavey:
Posted by Stephen Kaluski on May 3, 2012 at 4:12 PM
Hi John, the pose, look back and placement in frame is certainly better than the previous post. I feel you could lose perhaps half the space on the RHS, as there would still be enough space for the bird to walk into, but would remove the central placement look. Personally I think it looks a little too saturated, therefore adjusting the yellow, red will bring out some more detail in the wing feathers, plus some selective adjustments in Curves to help the blacks and again the detail. The whites also will improve too. However, you might also find that simply adjusting the WB & temperature firstly would also help?

Just my 2cents. :wink:

TFS
Steve
Posted by Phil Ellard on May 3, 2012 at 4:42 PM
Not a fan of the central position but everything else looks spot on :toast: :toast: :toast:
Posted by John MacTavish on May 3, 2012 at 4:56 PM
Cheers Steve. I'm really struggling with the colour on the shots I got when the sun came out. White balance was set on daylight, which generally covers anything I do but does not do early morning sunshine, which tends to saturate the birds anyway.
I don't do colour adjustment as a rule, simply because I can not tell the difference between red and green. Again the camera normally gets it right for me, but with the effing mk111 there is nothing that works simply in this situation. Cropping is something I prefer to leave to the end user and central in this case doesn't bother me too much. This image is full frame so not much room for a 3:2 crop w/o losing head or foot room.
Had a go at altering the white balance from 5236K as shot to 3660K. Certainly looks cooler to me, but I'm no judge of colour.

What do you think?
Posted by Stephen Kaluski on May 3, 2012 at 5:08 PM
Hi John, I had no idea re colour, however I might have some links for you. Although away, if you email me I can try and locate them & fwd if you think it would help. Might also suggest one thing you could try too.

All the best.
Steve
Posted by Nick on May 3, 2012 at 5:18 PM
2nd is more natural looking and shows the plumage colours correctly John - Picks up the lovely blue sheen of the neck feathers.

:wavey:
Posted by John MacTavish on May 3, 2012 at 5:29 PM
Looks right to me too Nick, but I can't help but feel it has a neutral look to it that misses out the rich sunlight that was on the bird. :toast:
Posted by Nick on May 3, 2012 at 6:28 PM
Then go somewhere between the two, but biased to the 2nd. The blacks look a bit too muddied in the 1st.
Posted by PhilH on May 4, 2012 at 2:52 AM
I'm with Nick here and think somewhere between the two images will be correct and still retain something of the light that you saw when taking the image.. the composition is fine for me too... Nice one...

:toast: :wavey: :toast:
Posted by Barry Southon on May 4, 2012 at 4:06 AM
John

A very interesting post, enhanced still further by the additional opinions and adjustments. Thanks for sharing.
:wink:
Posted by Bob Johnson on May 4, 2012 at 4:49 AM
I think the first one is fantastic as I love the almost oil painting look of it. Whilst the second is a bit more natural it seems a little large in the frame. Wish we had these is Essex :wink:

Bob :smile:
Posted by Robert Lawrence on May 4, 2012 at 3:07 PM
With the vignetted background I don't think the central placing of the bird is any problem and would leave it as it is. Colour wise I agree that the first was too warm but the second is just a tad too much the other way so I would be looking at warming the second just a touch. A cracking capture though and a wonderful pose. :toast: :toast:
Posted by Nick Mckeown on May 4, 2012 at 6:40 PM
The second post looks fine John but is not representative of the early morning warmth of the sun which I assume you were trying to capture. I guess it depends on what image you are trying to portray and I guess you probably need to play around a little with colour temps, saturation etc until it is there. Both posts stand on their own merits.

Nick. :smile: :wavey:
Posted by Dave Bartlett on May 4, 2012 at 6:59 PM
Prefer the second one, but folks are right that it does look cooler and has lost the warmth of the morning sun. Comp is fine for me.

Dave :toast: