Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

A bit of Arsenic

Discussion

11 replies
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on June 23, 2012 at 4:07 AM
A bit of Arsenic
#1 - as we arrived

Here are a few variations on Arsenic Arch. It's tucked away in the proposed Dirty Devil Wilderness Area, and doesn't get much visitation - other than John Mumaw.

We arrived just in time to set up for sunset and couldn't dally too long because the climb out could pose problems in the dark.

I haven't found any history on the naming of this arch.
Does anyone know why it was named Arsenic ?
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on June 23, 2012 at 4:08 AM
#2 - last direct light on the full arch

24mm TS-E pano stitch - 2 images
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on June 23, 2012 at 4:09 AM
#3 - twilight reflected light

2 image exposure blend.
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on June 23, 2012 at 4:09 AM
#4 - last light after the climb out

View east toward the Maze District, over the proposed Dirty Devil Wilderness Area.
Posted by Grant Collier on June 23, 2012 at 10:52 AM
These are all quite nice and I think #1 is my fave.
Posted by John Mumaw on June 23, 2012 at 11:19 AM
Great find Bill, and you really did justice to this arch! Pretty interesting climb down and back, isn't it? :wink:
I like 'em all with no clear favorites. Well, maybe #3 stands out to me. Good work!

Arsenic Wash is just below the arch, which drains into Poison Springs Canyon, which then drains into the Dirty Devil River.
One thing is for sure...I would filter any water I found in that area!
Posted by Doug Koepsel on June 23, 2012 at 1:58 PM
Bill, overall my preference is for the first image. I like that the clouds' angle matches the slope of the arch. It seems the rock details and colors show better in 2, possibly due to a difference in contrast and/or sharpness levels?
The deep folds in 4 are interesting also.
Posted by Kane Engelbert on June 23, 2012 at 8:33 PM
Bill, #3 is my favorite. #2 is a close second place. For a small arch it shows itself a bit ominous in my opinion. And I like ominous stuff. In #3, I think cropping out the bushes would make that arch look larger and more ominous but certainly wouldn't make the image better. I suppose its a matter of scale and what appeals to the photographer.

I'm also trying to understand color in #2. The sky seems cool blues (which I love) and the clouds seem very warm/yellowish. Is that wildfire smoke messing with the color? Just curious.
Posted by Rod Chandler on June 23, 2012 at 8:47 PM
#2 and #3 get my vote Bill. Very nice images, all of them. One more place to put on my "gotta-go-there" list.

Posted by Bill Pelzmann on June 23, 2012 at 11:45 PM
John, yes, we found the climb down to the arch quite "interesting". It wasn't as bad as it first looks. That is, if you select a good route. Fortunately, the return was much easier, and we exited with a good margin for error.

OK, the name makes sense. Arsenic Wash into Poison Springs Canyon. Bring your own water, don't bother with filters. :biggrin:

Grant, I was thinking you'd love this location for some star shots. Just come prepared to spend the night.

Kane, there could have been some thin wildfire smoke on the eastern horizon, but I feel the clouds were just picking up the warm sunset light. I did cool the blues in the sky. The color contrast and saturations look good in PS and LR. I'm not at all happy with the color shifts in the conversion to sRGB and IE. I'll just have to see how these colors print.
Posted by jack jaeger jr on June 24, 2012 at 8:49 AM
#1 for me
Posted by Morris McClung on June 27, 2012 at 10:01 AM
Excellent shots, Bill! I REALLY like #2!