I agree with Bob .
Too many are with plain backdrops. Good for ID shots but they don't give any habittat indication. Still- personal taste again.(And my excuse for messy backgrounds !!
JR
Nice shot anyway.
Posted by Barry Southon on July 11, 2012 at 12:06 PM
Michael
Sharp and well detailed image I don't see a problem with a little environment.
Posted by Kim Connolly on July 11, 2012 at 2:04 PM
I like this very much, excellent detail in just about the right amount of background too.
Posted by Nick Mckeown on July 11, 2012 at 3:46 PM
Nice and sharp butterfly. Comp or cropping is very much personal but IMHO a vertical or portrait comp would have given it more room above and below and accentuate the grasses.
Nick.
Posted by David Sewell on July 12, 2012 at 8:01 AM
I agree with Nick and Phil, portrait format would have suited the vertical grass stems, but even so a good shot of one of my favourite butterflies.
David
Posted by David Sewell on July 12, 2012 at 8:01 AM
I agree with Nick and Phil, portrait format would have suited the vertical grass stems, but even so a good shot of one of my favourite butterflies.
Discussion
10 replies350D, 60mm 2.8 macro.
MJ
Bob
Too many are with plain backdrops. Good for ID shots but they don't give any habittat indication. Still- personal taste again.(And my excuse for messy backgrounds !!
JR
Nice shot anyway.
Sharp and well detailed image I don't see a problem with a little environment.
Nick.
David
David
Matt