that's nice Phil and rather comical. Maybe a little less space above the bird?
Matt
Posted by David Sewell on July 13, 2012 at 10:38 AM
I think the bird on the right, to whom I imagine it is either threatening or displaying, needs to be in either entirely or not at all. On the assumption that you would have included it all if you had it, it therefore has to go. On the plus side, I do like the attitude of the bird, and the exposure/processing looks bang on to me.
David
Posted by Neil Burton on July 13, 2012 at 11:06 AM
Nit covered, great pose.
Posted by Barry Southon on July 13, 2012 at 12:10 PM
Phil
I see where David is coming from and he is right. Still leaves a fine image.
Posted by David Taylor on July 13, 2012 at 1:59 PM
Reminds me of my son-in-law who is a carp and barbel fisherman, it must be in the genes. Great stuff.
I agree Phil after looking a few times- the right hand bird although an important part of the scen is somewhat distracting.If all of it had been in it would be better. Good stuff though.
JR
Discussion
8 repliesPhil.
d300 200f2 + 1.7 wide open @ f3.3 1/800th @ f3.3 iso200 Handheld.
PP in Bibble & CS2.
Matt
David
I see where David is coming from and he is right. Still leaves a fine image.
JR
Oscar