Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Theme: Southwestern Panos

Discussion

14 replies
Posted by Adam Schallau on May 7, 2006 at 8:50 PM
Thanks to Momo for suggesting this week's theme. Let's see what you've got, and if you don't mind please share how you created your shot, was it stitched, how many images, and any other fun details.
Posted by Guy Tal on May 8, 2006 at 12:35 AM
16 images stitched in PTAssembler. Not quite finished yet (this is from yesterday).

Guy
Posted by Adam Schallau on May 10, 2006 at 4:02 PM
Thanks for providing me with my sandstone fix Guy! :wavey:
Posted by Guy Tal on May 10, 2006 at 6:12 PM
Hey, sandstone I have plenty of - if you need another hit, just let me know :smile:
Am I the only one stitching around here?

Guy
Posted by Momo Vuyisich on May 11, 2006 at 10:37 AM
Guy, that is a beautiful photo.

I make a lot of panoramas, but don't have any good ones. They are all shot in the middle of the day, with harsh light. I have not yet done a matrix one like Guy, but will have to give it a try. I guess the goal would be to print large with good sharpness.

Guy, how big is that final photo in pixels? Is the stitching perfect or you can see fuzzy areas?

Thanks for sharing.
Posted by Guy Tal on May 11, 2006 at 11:54 AM
Momo, it's about 80 megapixels total (don't have the file with me right now for exact measurements) and the detail is phenomenal - much better than a 4x5 scan in my opinion.
The stitching is perfect. I can't tell where the lines are. I installed AutoPano and Enblend and used PTAssembler in auto mode so for the most part it was just waiting for it to finish - no manual intervention on this one.

Guy
Posted by Momo Vuyisich on May 11, 2006 at 9:20 PM
Wow, 80MP. I would love to see a large print of that one day. When you have a gallery in Salt Lake, I'll go check it out.

PTAssebler is really amazing. I also use the auto mode and it stitches perfectly. I just never tried a matrix, but I will this weekend. Thanks again.
Posted by Eric A. Rosen on May 24, 2006 at 3:02 PM
Sorry I don't have any southwest panoramas as of yet, but i do have the following panoramas...

http://www.pbase.com/desertrat99/panorama_photos
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on May 24, 2006 at 8:51 PM
Guy, what focal length were you using? 100 mm?
Posted by Guy Tal on May 25, 2006 at 10:03 AM
Bill, I was using a 70-200 zoom at the 70mm end, if I remember correctly.

Guy
Posted by Warren Xato on May 25, 2006 at 12:36 PM
Vermillion Cliffs. I used AutoPano, a wonderful tool.

http://www.120scan.us/i/P4024111-116.jpg

I was thinking that I don't really need a fancy SLR for matrix pano shots, just a small P&S with manual focus and exposure. AutoPano incorporates HDR with stitching.

Warren
Posted by Guy Tal on May 25, 2006 at 12:45 PM
Warren - I just got APP and share your thoughts - an amazing tool. PTAssembler did a decent enough job but I found myself having to stitch a few large images manually when it failed in auto mode. APP also seems a lot faster.

Guy
Posted by Todd Caudle on May 29, 2006 at 8:23 AM
Nice shot, but is it a Southwest panorama?
Posted by Guy Tal on May 30, 2006 at 8:35 AM
Well, if you have to nitpick, I think this complies with at least one dictionary definition. Here's what Merriam-Webster says:

Main Entry: pan·o·rama
Pronunciation: "pa-n&-'ra-m&, -'rä-
Function: noun
Etymology: pan- + Greek horama sight, from horan to see -- more at WARY
1 a : CYCLORAMA 1 b : a picture exhibited a part at a time by being unrolled before the spectator
2 a : an unobstructed or complete view of an area in every direction b : a comprehensive presentation of a subject <a panorama of American history> c : RANGE
3 : a mental picture of a series of images or events

There's nothing here that talks about aspect ratio.

Now how about posting some of your half-slide creations?

Guy
Posted by Guy Tal on May 30, 2006 at 8:37 AM

This, on the other hand, has the acceptable aspect ratio but is a single frame (cropped from 4x5) and a very tight view so technically it's not really a panorama :smile:

Guy