Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Coyote Buttes (repost of #1)

Discussion

22 replies
Posted by Doug Koepsel on October 24, 2012 at 12:13 AM
Coyote Buttes (repost of #1)
I was anle to draw a permit for South Coyte Buttes for this past Sunday. Shane Knight, a friend and large format photographer in Flagstaff joined me on the permit. First hand reports were that Bucksin Gulch was mucky and thigh/waist deep, so we aborted that hike and tooled around the plateau in areas new to me. A couple of spots will be worth returning to under favorable light.

Here are a few from SCB on Sunday, and a B&W of the cliffs. Another is posted in ESS.

#1 The sun snuck under the clouds to briefly light the butte and remained long enough to get 4 shots for a focal blend.
(Larger image provided)

Posted by Doug Koepsel on October 24, 2012 at 12:16 AM
#2 Sand and Stone
The colors and shapes in the sandstone above Vermilion Cliffs is fascinating.
Posted by Doug Koepsel on October 24, 2012 at 12:18 AM
#3 Vermilion Cliffs B&W
Posted by Bill Bean on October 24, 2012 at 12:19 AM
All are nice but #2 and 3 are my favorites. #2 is the jaw dropper for me. I love this kind of detail shot
Posted by Peter Coskun on October 24, 2012 at 12:37 AM
These are all nice Doug, I'm partial to grand landscapes, so the first one is my favorite, then the second for it's intimacy. I feel there is a bit much of the sky in the 3, but it doesn't really take away from the image.
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on October 24, 2012 at 1:38 AM
#2 stamds out for me, but I'm partial to sandstone abstracts.
Posted by Kane Engelbert on October 24, 2012 at 6:53 AM
Hi Doug, you got some funky noise going on in the clouds in #1, it's my fav of the bunch. I'm guessing you had a VERY high dynamic range to shoot and handle, and your overall sky image had to be quite underexposed to handle the huge highlights on the right. Thus you had to pull detail out of the clouds on the left to match your foreground while keeping your highlights under control. BRUTAL...Two ways to handle this...take even more exposures of that sky then blend, blend, blend. Or, having a look at the these new cameras with the big shadow dynamic range.

Posted by Darren Huski on October 24, 2012 at 8:18 AM
Really like that first one. Most images from Coyote Buttes seem to be blue sky only. Nice to see some clouds.
Posted by Doug Koepsel on October 24, 2012 at 10:29 AM
Thanks all for the feedback.
Kane, you are right about the exposure used for the sky. Unfortunately I did not take any more exposures of the sky that might be blended. (next time). I will rework the sky exposure differently to see if I can rid the color weirdness. I appreciate your detailed suggestions.
Darren, CB seems to have its share of Willie Nelson's blue skies. We got lucky on this trip for the evening sky, considering the permit was applied for months in adavance.
Posted by Howard Cihak on October 24, 2012 at 2:18 PM
Doug, the 1st one is nice, but put me down for #2. I really like the colors and textures.
Posted by Kane Engelbert on October 24, 2012 at 5:25 PM
Doug, I woke up this morning and realized I forgot one more thing concerning my post. Its my experience shooting super high dynamice range images with clouds is one of the most challenging blends. Its the moving clouds. We know using multiple images for exposure with moving clouds can be tough. Ive come to the conclusion that if the dynamic range is just too much for the exposure range of a single Raw image, then I'll have to live with some blown out highlights; which might not be a bad thing considering that's likely what the true scene looked like.
Posted by Morris McClung on October 24, 2012 at 6:31 PM
1 and 3 are nice, but #2 is fairly fascinating.
Posted by John Mumaw on October 24, 2012 at 7:48 PM
What Morris said. I like #2 and your image in the Landscape gallery a lot! No nits from me.
Posted by Bret Edge on October 25, 2012 at 8:16 AM
These are all lovely, Doug. If I'm forced to pick a favorite, it would be the black and white. Guess I'm just in a monochrome mood. ;-) I've got to get back out to this spot!
Posted by Doug Koepsel on October 25, 2012 at 12:11 PM
Bret and Peter, I did take some horizontal versions of the B&W. I know its a horizontal world, but i was drawn to the clouds overhead for a vertical comp.
Posted by John Mumaw on October 25, 2012 at 6:27 PM
I much prefer the original as the sky above the clouds provides more drama and a good balance with the empty foreground.
Posted by Marylynne Diggs on October 25, 2012 at 7:21 PM
First and second are spectacular. I love the matrix of bunch grass in the foreground of the last one, but I'm curious about the color there. The sand and grass color contrast captivated me when I was visiting that area last month.
Posted by Richard Olsen on October 26, 2012 at 3:09 PM
Great vision and capture on these Doug!
Posted by Doug Koepsel on October 27, 2012 at 4:19 PM
Repost of #1. I reprocessed the raw of the sky before combining with the land. No D-lighting, less saturation, removed a little yellow, and painted the bright spots.
I think I am mentally stuck on this location trying to get a good sunset shot, as I like the colors and cracks of the foreground leading to the formation.
Marylynne, the small clumps of brush were pretty brown when we stopped, making the foreground uninspiring.
Posted by John Mumaw on October 27, 2012 at 6:31 PM
It's amazing what a few tweaks can accomplish. I like this redux quite a bit, Doug!
Posted by Soubhik Patranabis on October 27, 2012 at 7:55 PM
Amazing !
Posted by Karl Buiter on October 28, 2012 at 12:56 AM

A note about Buckskin Gulch as mentioned in the first post. I was at the BLM office today (got a SCB walk-in for Sunday) and conversation turned to Buckskin. Apparently there is one very deep pool about 10-20' across at the start. Those who get past that have made a trail through the debris area further down.
Posted by Chikku Baiju on October 29, 2012 at 1:48 AM
Awesome shots doug. The repost of #1 is much better. The light and the comp is excellent. #2 is also nice. I think a closer comp focusing more on the textures would have been nicer. I like the vertical comp of #3.