Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Lakeland Pine Reflection

Discussion

11 replies
Posted by Phil Ellard on November 4, 2012 at 8:52 AM
Lakeland Pine Reflection
:wavey:

Had a week in the rain in the lakes, got a few shots which i will share with you over the weeks.

In line with the current debate 3 exposures, taken 3 times for 3 different focus points, two hikers and an over bright stone cloned out, processed in LR4, CS6 and Photmatix, John I am sorry and reflections too :biggrin: :biggrin: hope you like any way

As ever all C&C warmly welcomed



:wavey: :toast: :toast:
Posted by Andy Astbury on November 4, 2012 at 11:19 AM
Nice looking image Phil.

If it had been me I'd have framed a little further right with the end tree on the frame centreline and perhaps with the skyline a little lower in the frame.

Really curious at to why you are using Photomatix if you've got LR4 and CS6/ACR 7.2 - HDR plugins are so last year :wink: :wink:
Posted by Bob Johnson on November 4, 2012 at 11:41 AM
Yes a bit more sky would enhance an already smart image Phil :wink:

Bob :smile:
Posted by Phil Ellard on November 4, 2012 at 12:45 PM
I know how to use photomatix so will use it forever!!!! funny i cropped in a little to reduce the sky as i felt it was featureless and needed to go, I agree about the tree comp though. I was going to have another go but the wind blew the reflections away and the sky stopped threatening and started to rain so i went for lunch :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast:
Posted by Andy Astbury on November 4, 2012 at 1:00 PM
Oh Phillip ............ you and me need to have words :frown:

Fully compliant PV2012, which you have with LR4/CS6/ACR 7.2, makes HDR plugins obsolete, gives a 100% natural look every time, is a far easier process, gives you twice the exposure latitude and twice the bit depth. Exporting to Photomatix means you are not extracting as much image quality as it's now possible to do.
Posted by Phil Ellard on November 4, 2012 at 1:02 PM
I will look at it cheers, just when i thought I have things sorted :biggrin: :wavey: :toast:
Posted by Oscar Dewhurst on November 4, 2012 at 5:34 PM
I'm no landscape photographer Phil, but I like this. Agree about skyline though I think :toast: :toast:

Oscar :wavey:
Posted by Craig Jones on November 4, 2012 at 6:16 PM
I do like the lead inline from the fence Phil brilliant portrait compostion also :wink: :wink: :wavey:
Posted by keith mitchell on November 5, 2012 at 3:02 AM
Phili could not do a landscape if i tried this looks great :jump:

Keith.
Posted by Neil Burton on November 5, 2012 at 11:02 AM
Works for me Phil. Andy is on at me about LR too, but I am from Yorkshire, gotta eat coal to survive.
Posted by PhilH on November 5, 2012 at 3:41 PM
Haha LR4 is the way to go.... its adaptive, I have got to agree with Mr A...

Image critique, I really am not a landscaper but I am left feeling that I want to see a lot more of the surroundings, its a great scene but all seems to end in the centre, I hope that makes a bit of sense...

:toast: :wavey: :toast:
Posted by John Robinson on November 5, 2012 at 6:18 PM
Try Paint Shop Pro mate !!!!!!!! :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast:
JR