Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

OT - Cell Phone Coverage

Discussion

17 replies
Posted by Howard Cihak on April 23, 2013 at 6:47 AM
I'm fortunate(?) to live in a part of the U.S. where, no matter what brand of cell phone service you subscribe to, you can get at least a few bars of reception.

Unfortunately, I like to drive around the western U.S. in some of the more remote areas (is Moab remote?) where I find my AT&T service is a big fat zero. I'm looking to switch services, but I have no idea which companies provide halfway decent cell service in the Mountain States regions.

Any suggestions or insights from those who live out there would be greatly appreciated.


Posted by John Mumaw on April 23, 2013 at 7:18 AM
Verizon covers the Colorado Plateau better than any other service I know of, Howard. And it can still be spotty in places.
Each wireless service has coverage maps on their website that may help you
Posted by Monika Chace on April 23, 2013 at 9:51 AM
Howard, I also chose Verizon for that reason. But in places like Bluff, there is (or was, don't know the current situation) no tower, so you have to rely on wi-fi. But I've gotten good Verizon signals in Monument Valley & up on top of the Moki Dugway.
Posted by Erik Stensland on April 23, 2013 at 9:55 AM
I use the cheap pay as you go phones for about $20 or $30 each and on my last trip to the SW I took two different phones, one Verizon and one AT&T. I had coverage almost all of the time on at least one of the phones.
Posted by Doug Koepsel on April 23, 2013 at 10:24 AM
Howard, I am in agreement about Verizon in the southwest. Have you considered a cell phone booster like from Wilson for your vehicle?
Posted by Howard Cihak on April 23, 2013 at 10:59 AM
Doug, cell phone booster? Tell me more. I know zip about this.
Posted by Bob Miller on April 23, 2013 at 11:08 AM
Stay away from Sprint & Virgin (who uses the same Sprint network) I have trouble getting reception even in areas of Phoenix! :mad:
Posted by David Kingham on April 23, 2013 at 12:07 PM
Here's the booster, I just picked one up myself, they boost the signal by 10x http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0011GI95A/ref=oh_details_o04_s00_i00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Posted by Scott Fricke on April 23, 2013 at 12:31 PM
I bought a signal booster a couple years ago and it does help extend the range noticeably. I bought it originally because there was a dead zone in my neighborhood in Colorado Springs and after getting the booster installed the dead zone disappeared. I've also tested it out in southern Utah, switching it on and off checking for signal/signal strength and it does work pretty well. It's not going to give you an extra 100 miles but it does give you some, it's hard to say how much as it depends so much on terrain, tower location, phone, etc.
Posted by Karl Buiter on April 23, 2013 at 2:39 PM
I also recommend a cel phone booster - the Wilson Amps work very well. If your vehicle has the size, I also use a Wilson RV Antenna for added gain. Remember, you got to hear it too! Typically 3 db of gain is a doubling of your signal strength. That is theoretical though, as cable, connections, ground plane can subtract from that.

My own setup is more about data than voice - I use a wired Wilson Cel amp + RV Antenna connected directly to my Verizon MiFi JetPack card. From there, I fill my cabin with good wifi for Internet access and video streaming. Heh, sometimes my convoy partners in other vehicles can get Internet off my MiFi. Many of the storm chasers (see chaserTV.com) use this type of kit along with a webcam to send live video from their chases.

My personal measured best was about 40 miles with a directional (Turquoise Peak to Ibex in the Mojave near Baker). Keep in mind cel phone boosting when you are near many antennas may cause unnecessary signal/tower jumping.

de KF6VOM (yeah, I also do Ham Radio)
Posted by John Mumaw on April 23, 2013 at 6:10 PM
This thread gets me to wonderin'...how did we cope before cell phones became ubiquitous? :confused:
Rhetorical ramblings is all. :wink:
Posted by Howard Cihak on April 23, 2013 at 6:18 PM
Indeed, John. And I'm reminded that the miles of files in the government was only made possible by copy machines. Before that, 6 carbons of any document was about the practical limit. But let's shut down this mental exploration before some film buff decides to riff on digital cameras.
Posted by Karl Buiter on April 23, 2013 at 7:10 PM
>> But let's shut down this mental exploration before some film buff decides to riff on digital cameras. <<

Daguerreotypes Rock!
Posted by John Mumaw on April 23, 2013 at 7:35 PM
"But let's shut down this mental exploration before some film buff decides to riff on digital cameras."
Touché, Howard! :toast:
Posted by Howard Cihak on April 23, 2013 at 9:04 PM
Thanks to one and all for the heads up on Verizon, and to David for the light bulb moment on cell phone boosters. Ya learn somethin' new every day. :biggrin:
Posted by Stan Rose on April 24, 2013 at 1:17 AM
dunno bout the rockies, but verizon is the way to go in da plains for storm chasing. :smile: and im with John--which is why i vow to be the last man on earth without a cell...
Posted by Rodney Ninow on April 24, 2013 at 8:27 PM
In White Pocket, I had 4g on ATT, but Verizon was bupkiss, nothing. I travel a lot all over the southwest with my buddy, he has Verizon. It seems like when he has service in remote areas, I do not. When I do, he does not. ATT 4g also worked at the Racetrack in Death Valley, but not in Beatty, NV. Go figure!
Posted by Bob Falcone on April 24, 2013 at 11:40 PM
Another (belated) vote for Verizon...
But to answer Johns question, way back when cell phones were almost a small piece of luggage I had a ham radio license and could link up with repeaters all around the country. Many had a phone "patch" that allowed you to make a call from your radio and usually for free! But I digress... Now, where did I put that glass plate? :biggrin: