Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Not so Common Beech

Discussion

6 replies
Posted by David Taylor on May 16, 2006 at 4:50 PM
Not so Common Beech
I took this photo last Sunday after a heavy shower of rain.The subject is Fagus sylvatica 'Franken' a rare variegated form of Common Beech I have growing in my garden.

Sony DSC F717 hand held

:smile:
Posted by David J Slater on May 16, 2006 at 5:03 PM
Nice composition, but I don't like the highlights and glare of the leaves - too fussy and a bit too contrasty for me. Try to take the shot in overcast conditions OR resist from boosting the saturation / contrast too much. (You never can tell these days (the digital age) about the original lighting conditions of a shot).

Dave
Forest of Dean, UK
Posted by PhilH on May 16, 2006 at 5:26 PM
Interesting....... possible Dave has mistaken the variegation as glare? I think I would have prefered a closer view, particularly with the water drops on the leaves. Nice to see.

:toast:
Posted by Michael Sayles on May 17, 2006 at 8:09 AM
Yes, although I first thought it was reflected light, my eyes adjusted and I realised it was just the colouring of the leaves!

I quite like the pattern created by the composition.

Michael S
Posted by Elliott Neep on May 17, 2006 at 1:39 PM
Not for me I'm afraid. Looks like a direct flash has been used as it looks quite contrasty with bright highlights and heavy shadows. As suggested, have another go under an overcast sky and go close to a leaf and focus on its variegated pattern... maybe add a few drops of water of your own for that sparkle. :smile:
Posted by John MacTavish on May 17, 2006 at 3:58 PM
Variegated maybe, but it still looks like flash highlights. Maybe in soft light w/o the rain it could be a lot prettier.

John
Posted by David Taylor on May 18, 2006 at 1:18 PM
Thanks for all your comments :smile: That's what's great about this forum, photography is
so subjective; everybody has their own way of looking at things. I liked the contrasty look with bright highlights and heavy shadows :wink: I've taken another(slightly different perspective) using John's suggestions.
I'm not not so sure about it; probably my lack of skill or critical acumen :rolleyes: