Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Grizzlor confirmed

Discussion

3 replies
Posted by David Prichard on May 22, 2006 at 2:26 PM
So says Northern News, the newspaper of the Canadian NWT.

A bear, shot by an American hunter on the Arctic coast, has proven to be a cross between a grizzly and a polar bear. This is the first time such a cross has been known to happen in the wild.

It does lead to speculation as to whether, do to warmer climate, grizzlies are ranging further north and polar bears venturing south in search of food. Evolution at work, or a one off chance? Time will tell.

Cheers,
Dave
Posted by Guy Tal on May 22, 2006 at 4:10 PM
Shame that what could have been an interesting specimen, maybe even the ancestor of new races of bears, met with a tragic demise to satisfy someone's idea of recreation.

Guy
Posted by Ott Luuk on May 23, 2006 at 6:54 AM
An ancestor to a new race of bears? Probably no more than a mule would be an ancestor to a new race of horses. Most known hybrids are either weak, sickly or infertile. There have been cases where a foreign species was introduced in the range of a related, native species. They started to cross and produced weak, hybrid offspring. Both populations of pure species suffered, because some of their breeding efforts each year were wasted to produce the unfit or infertile hybrids.

" It does lead to speculation as to whether, do to warmer climate, grizzlies are ranging further north and polar bears venturing south in search of food."

Yes, but a one-of-a-kind hybrid is hardly a real proof. You`d need extensive data through decades to show a significant change. Basically you don`t need more than one bear of each species to produce a cross, even if it is highly unlikely.
Posted by Guy Tal on May 23, 2006 at 7:53 AM
Ott, I guess we'll never know. That was my point.

Guy