Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

10 stop ND v. Solar Filter

Discussion

4 replies
Posted by Marylynne Diggs on July 7, 2017 at 12:55 PM
I figure my topic title will get a quick reaction.  I am going to be watching the eclipse in central Oregon in August, and I need to by a solar filter for my 100-400 mm L.  I already have a 10 stop ND, but I assume that is not enough or that solar filters are different in some way?  I see one B+W that came up in the search, but it was only 10 stops, and most of the others are 18 (but perhaps for telescopes and therefore more magnification).

I could get the Thousand Oaks one folks have mentioned, but I don't want to spend more or less than necessary.
ML
Posted by Keith Bauer on July 7, 2017 at 3:56 PM
Marilyn:  A 10 stop ND is not even close for use as a solar filter unless you want to damage your camera sensor and more importantly, your eyes.

There's another thread that I posted on HERE

You can buy a piece of Solar film for $37 and make your own.  Very simple to do.  I've already made one for my 500 f/4 and my 100-400 out of a single sheet of the solar film referenced in that thread.
Posted by Jim DeWitt on July 7, 2017 at 4:01 PM
Keep the unfiltered direct sunlight out of your camera and lens; they weren't designed for it. Keith's advice is spot-on.
Posted by Dan Schwartz on July 11, 2017 at 5:55 PM
Solar filters are 16.5 to 18 stops. B+H has solar film in foldable cardboard that go over your lens for $12 to 25 in different sizes. Just ordered one.
Posted by Marylynne Diggs on July 15, 2017 at 12:38 AM
Thank you so much....I had seen a 10 stop pop up in a google search, and I think I got confused.
ML