I hope this is not too similar to the topic: Digital Manipulation--How Far Is Too Far? by Kevin. I understand not changing the original image to the degree such as removing actual objects from an image or adding images within images . . .ok.
BUT--Many editors make image requests such as: ". . .beyond some basic adjustments, leave an image alone."
My question is . . . in these instances, do you make minor adjustments to contrast,levels,saturation, and especially sharpness?? Is applying sharpness a no-no when submitting to magazines?
Thanks for your input!
Joni James
Yes, this is a very similar topic. I think it would fit well as a continuation on Kevin's post, but I'll make a reply seperately anyway.
First, get used to these type of requests from editors. Editors now feel the need to regulate the types of allowable images for their publications due to the declining 'trust' in the photographic medium. Every editor is going to have to make decisions on what consitutes manipulation for their publications' integrity. For example, photo art would not usually be appropriate for a news magazine.
I think your assumption in regards to what this editor is trying to convey is accurate. However, sharpening is certainly allowable by most standards. Just don't over-do it. I would probably assume that levels (color, contrast, ect.) would be considered minor adjustments (and sometimes necessary) but again, don't over-do it to the point of looking wildly unnatural or damaging the image.
But as Guy states in the similar post, "manipulation is in the eye of the beholder". There is no firm line between photography and photo art.
Discussion
2 repliesBUT--Many editors make image requests such as: ". . .beyond some basic adjustments, leave an image alone."
My question is . . . in these instances, do you make minor adjustments to contrast,levels,saturation, and especially sharpness?? Is applying sharpness a no-no when submitting to magazines?
Thanks for your input!
Joni James
First, get used to these type of requests from editors. Editors now feel the need to regulate the types of allowable images for their publications due to the declining 'trust' in the photographic medium. Every editor is going to have to make decisions on what consitutes manipulation for their publications' integrity. For example, photo art would not usually be appropriate for a news magazine.
I think your assumption in regards to what this editor is trying to convey is accurate. However, sharpening is certainly allowable by most standards. Just don't over-do it. I would probably assume that levels (color, contrast, ect.) would be considered minor adjustments (and sometimes necessary) but again, don't over-do it to the point of looking wildly unnatural or damaging the image.
But as Guy states in the similar post, "manipulation is in the eye of the beholder". There is no firm line between photography and photo art.