Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Broad-bodied No 2

Discussion

14 replies
Posted by Tim Munsey on July 10, 2006 at 4:13 PM
As its broad bodied season, make hey while it shines and that stuff, here's another taken damsel style.

Tim
D2X, 300mm f/4, 1/90 at F/8
Posted by Justin on July 10, 2006 at 4:25 PM
Superb shot Tim and well up to your usual high standard.
Excellent job on keeping the perch exposure in check whilst still revealing loads of detail in the dragonflies dark body.
Tack sharp and an excellent quality image.
:toast: :toast:
Posted by Sean Bolton on July 10, 2006 at 4:28 PM
Hi Tim

Another top notch closeup shot. I like the side on angle. Great detail and colour. No cloning needed on this one :wink:

:toast:

cheers

Sean
Posted by Rob Howard on July 10, 2006 at 4:50 PM
Hi Tim,

As usual, Out of focus, poor composition, bad Depth of field and colour could do with alot of tweaking in PS, that BG is very distracting as well.............. :biggrin:

Only joking mate, this is up there with the very best. Absolutely perfect.

Well Done

Regards

Rob
Posted by Christopher Wilson on July 10, 2006 at 4:50 PM
Excellent standard as usual Tim.
Great detail and you have stirred me from my slumber, I might even go out to try and find some myself but I would be happy with something half as good. :toast:
Posted by Philip Kirkham on July 10, 2006 at 5:10 PM
Hello Tim
Yes, yet another cracker. I particularly like the eyes in this one, they are more than just black holes, they seem to exude character.
Best wishes
Phil :toast: :toast: :toast:
Posted by Danny Green on July 10, 2006 at 5:14 PM
Hi Tim

I was going to say what Rob said but he must be a faster typer than me , great shot how do you get them to look so sharpe or is it just that I am c$%$. :frown:

Dan
Posted by Peter Barritt on July 11, 2006 at 2:38 AM
great stuff Tim. only suggestion I'd make is whether if you'd have dropped slightly lower, the front wing wouldn't be obscuring the body.interested that you aren't using your 150 macro for shots like this. Pete
Posted by Tim Munsey on July 11, 2006 at 3:11 AM
Hi Peter,
If you go lower you loose more of the pretty blue abdomen, having said that maybe the thorax is nice but I can't remember. My 150mm has been put away because the 300mm is my new toy, not because its not capable, but the 300mm does have longer reach and so easier to stalk and capture these beautiful creatures. For damsels and smaller I reckon the 150mm is the one to use.

Hey Danny, there's no way you can do c$%$ from what I've seen.

Cheers

Tim
Posted by Dave Courtenay on July 11, 2006 at 3:39 AM
Brilliant shot and presentation :toast:
Posted by PhilH on July 11, 2006 at 3:48 AM
Excellent B.B.C. detail is outstanding... hats off to you, I have yet to even see one this year, perhaps I ought to start looking :biggrin:

:toast: :toast:
Posted by Helge Sorensen on July 11, 2006 at 10:16 AM
You continue to impress me with these shot, Tim :toast: :toast:
Posted by Larry Corbett on July 11, 2006 at 10:57 AM
Incredible detail...ever tried photographing one of these guys in flight ?...it's a REAL challenge and it's very frustrating :frown:

:wavey:
Posted by Peter Barritt on July 11, 2006 at 12:42 PM
thanks for extra info Tim. :toast: impressive sharpness from this lens. You have a great talent for macro work. Peter
Posted by David Kjaer on July 11, 2006 at 1:20 PM
Another beauty!

David :toast: :toast: