Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Pec pads vs Sensor Swipes

Discussion

4 replies
Posted by David Prichard on July 24, 2006 at 7:54 PM
While ordering some more Eclipse fluid, I noticed on the manufacturer website they do not recommend Pec Pads for sensor cleaning as with the Copper Hill Method.

As they manufacture both, one would think they knew what they were talking about. On the other hand, at $50 for a dozen Sensor Swipes it may be a case of modern marketing.

Has anyone heard of any damages to sensors as a result of Pec Pads?

Cheers,
Dave
Posted by Ed Cordes on July 24, 2006 at 9:25 PM
I use the pec pads and Eclipse with the applicator that comes with the Copper Hill system without problems. The cost is much lower than Sensor Swabs. Maybe I am doing it wrong, but Ifind I need to use about 3-6 Sensor Swabs or Copper Hill Pec Pads per deep cleaning of my sensor. Sensor Swabs are just too expensive when the Pec Pads work just as well.
Posted by Guy Tal on July 25, 2006 at 9:51 AM
I agree with Ed. No problem with Pec Pads here.

Guy
Posted by Walter Rowe on July 25, 2006 at 2:12 PM
Ditto here too. Pec Pads with Eclipse.
Posted by Lin Evans on July 25, 2006 at 6:47 PM
Pec Pads are used for a variety of other tasks so when you have dedicated lots of money and marketing to creating Sensor Swabs you naturally "recommend them" LOL - the primary differences are costs and convenience. It's very convenient to use Sensor Swabs but also very expensive. I bought one round of Sensor Swabs and just use the little plastic centers to mount my Pec Pads on. As long as you don't try to cut them and get "frizzies" which can fall off onto the AA filter in front of the sensor, Pec Pads work just as well in my experience.

Lin