Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
The Rubbing Tree
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

The Rubbing Tree

by JACK NEAL

Gallery: WildlifePosted November 10, 2009140 views5 comments
This elk had recently taken the velvet from his antlillers and was using this tree to rub his neck. It was not yet September, but he was rounding up a harem. Yellowstone, late August.

50D
SS 1/250
F 5
ISO 100
FL 160

Thanks for looking at my picture and thanks for any comment.

Comments

5 comments
Comment posted by Gary Gulash on November 11, 2009 at 1:10 AM
I like that you used the overhanging branch to try and frame the elk. I would like to see a bit more separation of the elk from the branch however, it's touching - and we can't have anything touching! :biggrin: A slightly lower angle, if possible, might have resolved that issue and made the viewer feel he was more a part of the experience. Impressive rack on this big guy!
Registered on January 28, 2005, 879 Posts, 12098 Comments
Comment posted by Jorne de Bruin on November 11, 2009 at 7:22 AM
I echo Gary's comments on this one :toast:
Registered on June 26, 2008, 178 Posts, 2136 Comments
Comment posted by JACK NEAL on November 11, 2009 at 12:13 PM
Thanks for the comments. I used the clone tool and removed the branch. You are right, it is a cleaner picture.
Registered on September 26, 2009, 131 Posts, 554 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on November 11, 2009 at 1:15 PM
Jack, I like how you used the tree trunk and overhead branch to frame the animal and the fact that it is looking to the right helps the composition. I do feel that a lower angle and better light would make the overall image more interesting though.
Regarding the cloning; yes it makes a cleaner image; personally I would not have gone to this extend of cloning (anymore), but that is entirely a matter of what type of image manipulation one finds acceptable.
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on November 13, 2009 at 9:41 AM
Hi Jack,

Definitely an impressive specimen. The other guys have made some good points already and I think the re-post is an improvement. Regarding the cloning: you'll find a range of opinions on how much image "manipulation" is acceptable - some photographers think of their work simply as "art" and thus feel that anything goes (and is acceptable), while others feel photography should have more realism (and less manipulation) associated it with than other art forms. Ultimately it's up to you to decide where you stand on this issue (and where to draw the line, and what to disclose about your images).

Cheers...thanks for sharing this...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments