Hi all,
This is an image I've been wanting to post since I got back and finished it, but I had such a hard time finding a title for it I kept delaying it. I finally decided on Primal because for me this covered the emotional content in the best way. I especially loved the light of the early morning sun on the head, and decided to make it my focus in this image.
The image was taken in Spain, and altough this might look like a typical zoo shot I do urge you to take a look at the tech before you think it
I'd especially like to hear some opinions on the composition, and my 'choice' to leave certrain parts of the head out. ( I really had no choice if I wanted just the tigers face in the image, I was hanging over a 5 meter high wall with hungry tigers at the bottom when shooting this, so I did not have a lot of compositional freedom here

)
Thank you for looking!
Cheers!
Tech: Sony a700 with Minolta 300mm f2.8 & 2.0 Teleconverter @ f/5.6, iso 400 & 1/1000, 60% crop.
Comments
13 commentsI'm a real fan of eyes and frequently try to isolate them as the main point of interest in an image. Success, for me, is fleeting. Big Cats have piercing gazes that seem to reach the soul. I like the crispness of this image. If it were mine, I would have fixed the errant hair on the bridge of the nose, my eye continues to go to it, and perhaps worked on the eye goober in the white area just under the eye.
Nice shot!
Neil
For me the eye is the subject here, and as it is presented, it is smack in the middle. Also, I think there are quite a few elements in the shot that I would rather not see, or see more of. For instance, the little black triangle in the ulc doesn't add to the shot at all, and I think it shouldn't be there. Same goes for that sliver of white in the middle of the right edge of the frame. And then there's the nose and the whiskers - I'd prefer to see either more or nothing at all.
If this were mine, I'd try a different crop; a vertical one with the eye near the ulc and half of the nose near the lrc. It may not work, but this doesn't either (I know you appreciate me being brutally honest
Neil: I was not sure if I should remove the hair+goober, probably will try a version of it.
Marsel: you know I appreciate your honesty
The image does not really work for me like this, but I have not found an other composition that works better either... I should have shot a vertical, but sadly I didn't
John: For the shooting conditions I'd like to refer you to my previous post:
http://www.naturephotographers.net/imagecritique/ic.cgi?a=vp&pr=134013&CGISESSID=2e72ef3603e5e6fe6f2b13808d835237&u=27593
Basicly it's a large open enclosure, much much larger then any zoo (thats why its a wildlife park
Great Job!
Sorry that I'm jumping into this one late in the game...
The eye is certainly compelling, but I'm going the brutally honest route here and agree completely with Marsel's comments. While it's always tough to suggest "the best" crop ("the best" being completely subjective) in this this case without seeing the full frame image I find it extremely difficult. Personally (and if you have the pixels, image sharpness, and DOF to support it) I would go more "abstract" here and work as much as possible with the eye alone. So...I would crop closer and work with the diagonal formed by the eye and black line below it - I'd lose the distracting elements from the main subject (nose, whiskers, and that upper left black triangle) and fill the frame edge-to-edge with that beautiful black, orange and white fur. You have beautiful texture, colour and pattern - plus the awesome eye - to work with here...but you have to simplify it a lot more to make it work maximally. Hopefully you have enough pixels to work with...
Cheers...from...the "other" brutally honest guy...
Brad