Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Vitelline Warbler
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Vitelline Warbler

by Steve Balke

Gallery: AvianPosted December 28, 200998 views10 comments
Vitelline Warbler (Dendroica vitellina

This curious little bird has a very limited range: Cayman Islands and Swan Island (Honduras). Mainly because of this, coupled with land development, it is now listed as “near threatened” [http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/species/index.html?action=SpcHTMDetails.asp&sid=9116&m=0 ]

This image was captured on a guided walk of the Mastic Trail in Grand Cayman. As you can see from the image and from the techs, backlighting in the forest created a real challenge. NR and sharpening were applied. This included CS4 removal of a greenish stripe running along the back of the bird which was present in all the raw images of this bird and immune to exposure time and Canon lens corrections. The bird was quite close to me (2.7 m). I think this is a case where a fill flash would have been superior to trying to use the existing light via a high ISO.

All comments very welcome.

EOS 7D, EF100-400mm: ISO 3200, 400mm, 1/200 s, f/6.3. Image is 4304 x 3326 pixels (=14.3 MP or 80% of the 18 MP of the 7D).

Comments

10 comments
Comment posted by Mia McPherson on December 28, 2009 at 5:22 PM
Steve,

I am very challenged in assessing very bright images because of an eye condition that I have, but I think you are correct that fill flash would have helped with this image.

I didn't see these when I was in the Cayman's but perhaps I was there at the wrong time of the year. A very interesting species.
Registered on June 25, 2007, 491 Posts, 12566 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Dudley on December 28, 2009 at 8:19 PM
Pretty neat to get an image of this species Steve. However, I have to admit that the very bright and partly blown background spoils the aesthetics of the image for me.
Registered on March 30, 2007, 437 Posts, 10915 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on December 28, 2009 at 11:13 PM
I would agree that fill flash might have helped here, Steve. Still I am not put off by the bright bg in this instance. It seems to work with the yellows of the bird. I do think I can still see a hint of the green you mentioned. :toast:
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Saunders on December 29, 2009 at 2:43 AM
You did well under the conditions Steve, and its a beautiful and rare warbler !
A shame about the extremely bright BG, but that could not be helped in this case.
Registered on February 6, 2008, 321 Posts, 3035 Comments
Comment posted by Brian Gatlin on December 29, 2009 at 8:06 AM
Steve, I'll admit that I'm not crazy about the background, but I'm impressed that you got the warbler so well exposed--the bird looks really good here. The oof tail is fine with me, but I do wish the leg/foot was sharper. It's a treat to get to see this species--thanks for posting this.
Registered on March 21, 2009, 202 Posts, 4187 Comments
Comment posted by Cheryl Molennor on December 29, 2009 at 9:21 PM
wow Steve I've not attempted 3200 yet I'll be checcking inot it after seeing this, The NR worked great and still kept great detail. No sign of the green stripe to me and the bg colors are so pretty.
Registered on June 30, 2009, 300 Posts, 5051 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on December 29, 2009 at 11:55 PM
Thank you all for your careful assessments and comments. On this day I rapidly concluded that I needed to use spot metering or end up with bird silhouettes. That generally gave good exposure for the bird but, as you have seen, blows the background. Actually, I did lower the exposure on the blown spots in post processing. However, I can see from your comments that they are probably still too bright. There is actually plenty of flexibility in post-processing to adjust the background of course. So, compared to other problems (e.g. bird silhouettes, blur, etc., etc.), this is not a bad one. It just takes time and effort. However, I must admit that I don’t like the idea of doing too much to the background in post-processing. Also, backlighting like this is known to cause edge artifacts. That means more post processing and even then, as is evident here, some of you may see a residual. So, as I mentioned earlier, I think in this type of lighting situation I’ll opt for a fill flash. I could have even tried the in-camera flash this time but it didn’t even occur to me (I’ve become so focused on high sensitivity lately!]. I’m pleased that the detail in the bird shows up well despite the high ISO setting. Thank you all again for taking the time to comment. :smile:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by Ravee Wattanatanak on December 30, 2009 at 2:50 AM
Nice Warbler you got here.
Registered on December 12, 2008, 105 Posts, 786 Comments
Comment posted by Sally King on December 30, 2009 at 10:32 AM
The details are amazing however the bright area in front of the bird is a tad distracting. Still wouldn't mind having taken this shot myself.
Registered on December 2, 2008, 416 Posts, 4450 Comments
Comment posted by Simon Bennett on December 31, 2009 at 2:14 AM
Good shot under difficult conditions. I like the pose and eye contact. Focus on the eye is spot-on and good detail captured too.
Registered on February 4, 2007, 350 Posts, 4614 Comments