Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Forsters Tern (part 2)
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Forsters Tern (part 2)

by David Haynes

Gallery: AvianPosted May 11, 2010134 views17 comments
Here is another Forsters Tern shot from the other day. I like the background on this one and thought I would run series on these. I don't find these especially challenging to photograph in flight but I do find getting a good background pretty tough. Hope you enjoy. :biggrin:

D300S
200-400 @400
ISO 800
SS 1/2000
F/7.1
Mode Manual
WB Auto
Metering Spot
HH
Thanks for looking.


:wink:

Comments

17 comments
Comment posted by Jim DeWitt on May 11, 2010 at 2:00 AM
Nice flight shot. Good detail on the head.
Registered on August 28, 2006, 1240 Posts, 8506 Comments
Comment posted by SandyRichardsBrown on May 11, 2010 at 2:01 AM
Excellent image!
I DO find them tough to photograph, as they are so quick and change course often.
Great pose, feather detail, and perfect BG.
:toast:
Sandy r
Registered on November 24, 2003, 3937 Posts, 12909 Comments
Comment posted by Rob Drummond on May 11, 2010 at 7:02 AM
Lovely shot David - great detail and wing position

cheers
Rob
Registered on November 8, 2003, 617 Posts, 8267 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Dudley on May 11, 2010 at 7:41 AM
You've done well here David. I like the background too. I don't find them to be particularly easy to photograph either, though when they're flying into a head wind it certainly helps. The biggest challenge I have with them is getting the eye well defined.
Registered on March 30, 2007, 437 Posts, 10915 Comments
Comment posted by Jagdeep Rajput on May 11, 2010 at 9:06 AM
Nice shot, well executed. Wished to see more of the eye.
Jagdeep Rajput
Registered on April 29, 2008, 686 Posts, 2857 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Bowman on May 11, 2010 at 10:23 AM
Very nice flight shot David. I am also wondering if you can brig out just a touch more detail on the eye in processing? Small nit, but always nice to see more of the eye. Love the light you have on this shot!
Registered on June 19, 2008, 1005 Posts, 8028 Comments
Comment posted by Keith Bauer on May 11, 2010 at 10:25 AM
This is really nice. Great wing position, and position of the bird flying toward you. Background is pleasing. If anything, bringing out a bit more detail in the eye would make this pop even more.
Registered on November 20, 2003, 458 Posts, 4836 Comments
Comment posted by Craig Strand on May 11, 2010 at 11:53 AM
Very nice capture, I like the detail and downsweep of the wings. Your right the bird stands out really nice with the BG here. Well done!
Registered on March 30, 2008, 416 Posts, 2885 Comments
Comment posted by denise ippolito on May 11, 2010 at 12:42 PM
Very nice downstroke. Good details and exposure. The BG is pleasing. I might try to lighten the eye just a touch.
Registered on December 17, 2009, 202 Posts, 1529 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Bielefeld on May 11, 2010 at 2:21 PM
I find this species very difficult to get in-flight. The main issue, light in the eye. I would like to see a catchlight to help define the eye better in this image. Other than that, this is excellent. Great pose and a wonderful BG. At ISO 800 did you use NR on the BG? Just curious.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 360 Posts, 7132 Comments
Comment posted by David Haynes on May 11, 2010 at 3:52 PM
Ron,
Yes, I used selective background noise reduction. I use Photoshop elements 8. I just use their standard noise reducer. One day very soon I think I might graduate to the bigger, better program which I'm told is much more versatile. I'm still in the learning stages of post processing and don't care that much for all the time it takes to process photos. But, it's part of the package I guess. This particular shot was almost full frame which means the bird came very closr to me and blurred the background out very nicely which was at least 60-70 yards away. Rich would like to see more room in front. Me too Rich, but I'm not that keen on taking the time to try and do it. The background is fairly uneven and I'm not sure how that would turn out and I don't have any more cropped canvas to pull from. I'm not that experienced in trying to add canvas but maybe I'll give it a shot with this one. I too wish I had more light on the eye. Next time. I may post one more with better light on the eye and a totally different background. Thanks for everyones comments and suggestions. Dave :biggrin:
Registered on February 20, 2010, 110 Posts, 1511 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel & Loana on May 11, 2010 at 4:56 PM
Wonderful!

D&L
Registered on October 7, 2008, 166 Posts, 3044 Comments
Comment posted by David Chauvin on May 11, 2010 at 6:05 PM
A classic flight shot with a cool bg showing the environment. Excellent processing with some areas of true white in the feathers.
Registered on August 5, 2004, 1007 Posts, 5595 Comments
Comment posted by Keith A Anderson on May 11, 2010 at 7:48 PM
Super flight image, Dave. Great pose and the exposure is spot on. I, too, like the bg and the way it sets the bird off. :toast:
Registered on February 13, 2006, 166 Posts, 1818 Comments
Comment posted by Sharon Hallowell on May 11, 2010 at 9:12 PM
A little more detail in the eye and this is a real winner. Nice! Sharon
Registered on November 1, 2003, 392 Posts, 4810 Comments
Comment posted by Brian Gatlin on May 11, 2010 at 11:02 PM
excellent flight shot, David. nice and sharp, good bg, good DOF. I agree about trying to brighten the eye, and agree with Rich that a little more room in front would be ideal.
Registered on March 21, 2009, 202 Posts, 4187 Comments
Comment posted by Mia McPherson on May 12, 2010 at 11:16 AM
David,

I especially like the background you captured in this image. I like the comp, the pose of the tern and how nicely the bill of the bird stands out from the wing in the background.

I do think more detail would be visible in both versions of this image if they were not compressed so much. As posted the 720 pixel version is only 22.3 kb, which means this was way over compressed and the larger version is only 156 kb. When saving try to keep the smaller version close to 200 kb and the larger one closer to 500 kb and there will be less loss of detail.

There are some whites that are hot when viewed in a temporary threshold level layer, but you should be able to easily bring those down in raw.

Looking forward to the next image.
Registered on June 25, 2007, 491 Posts, 12566 Comments